Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlm, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorZsély, István
dc.contributor.authorPálvölgyi, Róbert
dc.contributor.authorVarga, Tamás
dc.contributor.authorNagy, Tibor
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Henry J.
dc.contributor.authorTurányi, Tamás
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-09T15:12:33Z
dc.date.available2016-11-09T15:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-12
dc.identifier.citationOlm, C,Zsely, IG,Palvolgyi, R,Varga, T,Nagy, T,Curran, HJ,Turanyi, T (2014) 'Comparison of the performance of several recent hydrogen combustion mechanisms'. Combustion And Flame, 161 :2219-2234.en_IE
dc.identifier.issn1556-2921
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/6150
dc.descriptionJournal articleen_IE
dc.description.abstractA large set of experimental data was accumulated for hydrogen combustion: ignition measurements in shock tubes (770 data points in 53 datasets) and rapid compression machines (229/20), concentration time profiles in flow reactors (389/17), outlet concentrations in jet-stirred reactors (152/9) and flame velocity measurements (631/73) covering wide ranges of temperature, pressure and equivalence ratio. The performance of 19 recently published hydrogen combustion mechanisms was tested against these experimental data, and the dependence of accuracy on the types of experiment and the experimental conditions was investigated. The best mechanism for the reproduction of ignition delay times and flame velocities is Keromnes-2013, while jet-stirred reactor (JSR) experiments and flow reactor profiles are reproduced best by GRI3.0-1999 and Starik-2009, respectively. According to the reproduction of all experimental data, the Keromnes-2013 mechanism is currently the best, but the mechanisms NUIG-NGM-2010, OConaire-2004, Konnov-2008 and Li-2007 have similarly good overall performances. Several clear trends were found when the performance of the best mechanisms was investigated in various categories of experimental data. Low-temperature ignition delay times measured in shock tubes (below 1000 K) and in RCMs (below 960 K) could not be well-predicted. The accuracy of the reproduction of an ignition delay time did not change significantly with pressure and equivalence ratio. Measured H-2 and O-2 concentrations in JSRs could be better reproduced than the corresponding H2O profiles. Large differences were found between the mechanisms in their capability to predict flow reactor data. The reproduction of the measured laminar flame velocities improved with increasing pressure and total diluent concentration, and with decreasing equivalence ratio. Reproduction of the flame velocities measured using the flame cone method, the outwardly propagating spherical flame method, the counterflow twin-flame technique, and the heat flux burner method improved in this order. Flame cone method data were especially poorly reproduced. The investigation of the correlation of the simulation results revealed similarities of mechanisms that were published by the same research groups. Also, simulation results calculated by the best-performing mechanisms are more strongly correlated with each other than those of the weakly performing ones, indicating a convergence of mechanism development. An analysis of sensitivity coefficients was carried out to identify reactions and ranges of conditions that require more attention in future development of hydrogen combustion models. The influence of poorly reproduced experiments on the overall performance was also investigated. (C) 2014 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_IE
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge the financial support of OTKA Grants K84054 and NN100523.
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_IE
dc.language.isoenen_IE
dc.publisherElsevier ScienceDirecten_IE
dc.relation.ispartofCombustion And Flameen
dc.subjectHydrogen combustionen_IE
dc.subjectDetailed mechanismsen_IE
dc.subjectMechanism testingen_IE
dc.subjectMechanism developmenten_IE
dc.titleComparison of the performance of several recent hydrogen combustion mechanismsen_IE
dc.typeArticleen_IE
dc.date.updated2016-10-20T09:23:58Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.03.006
dc.local.publishedsourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.03.006en_IE
dc.description.peer-reviewedpeer-reviewed
dc.contributor.funder|~|
dc.internal.rssid7106191
dc.local.contactHenry Curran, Dept Of Chemistry, Room 215, Arts/Science Building, Nui Galway. 3856 Email: henry.curran@nuigalway.ie
dc.local.copyrightcheckedNo
dc.local.versionACCEPTED
nui.item.downloads96


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record