The Prohibition of Environmental Damage during the Conduct of Hostilities in Non-International Armed Conflict
MetadataShow full item record
This item's downloads: 653 (view details)
This thesis examines the adequacy of the laws of armed conflict to prohibit environmental damage in non-international armed conflict. The overall conclusions is that the laws of armed conflict are not adequate in this regard because they do not apply in equal measure to state and non-state actors and they only provide piecemeal indirect environmental protection, which conforms to the requirements of the principle of legality and the rule of international law in only very specific circumstances. The thesis begins by tracing the historical development of the environmental dimension of the laws of armed conflict, to explain the absence of direct environmental protection provisions and to contextualise the discussion the subsequent chapters. It also briefly outlines the nature of the environmental damage caused by state and non-state actors in non-international armed conflict. Subsequently, the treaty-based and customary laws of armed conflict that have the potential to indirectly protect the environment in non-international armed conflict are identified and discussed. In this regard, Common Article 3, provisions of Additional Protocol II, some regulations on the methods and means of warfare, the Martens Clause, the principles of distinction, humanity, military necessity, proportionality and precautions in attack are interrogated, in addition to customary rules identified by the ICRC in their Customary Law Study.This examination of the laws of armed conflict is supplemented by analysis of the extent to which the proscriptive gaps in the laws of armed conflict can be filled by other branches of international law and mechanisms of international accountability. In particular, international human rights law, international environmental law, international criminal law, international civil compensation mechanisms and environmental ¿safe zones¿ are explored in Chapters 6 and 7. The conclusion summarises the main findings in the thesis, proves the research statement in answer to the research question, identifies limitations to the study and implications for future research.
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: From Separation to Complementary Application Prud'homme, Nancie (2012-05-23)This study analyses the interplay between international human rights and humanitarian law, with the aim of clarifying their concurrent application. Part I provides an understanding of each legal framework and of their ...
Mainstreaming disability in development aid: A comparative analysis of the United States Agency for International Development, the Australian Agency for International Development and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland Keogh, Mary (2014-05-15)Intergovernmental organisations such as the United Nations (UN) and the World Bank claim that the majority of the one billion persons with disabilities worldwide live in developing countries and are at high risk of poverty ...