Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCunningham, James
dc.identifier.citationCunningham, J; O Reilly, P; O Kane, C; Mangematin, V (2011) Glorified Administrators or Eminent Research Leaders: The Inhibiting Factors that Publicly Funded Principal Investigators Experience in Leading Collaborative Research Projects. CISC, .en_US
dc.description.abstractPublicly funded research continues to be an important and critical source of research funding for Higher Education Institutions, public research organisations and industry with many benefits accruing to the various stakeholders. Key actors in delivering publicly funded research projects are Principal Investigators (PIs). PIs are responsible for all aspects of publicly funded research projects and are awarded grants based on their scientific eminence, past achievements, the quality of the proposal and articulated outcomes relating to the public funding calls. Becoming a publicly funded PI is seen as significant developing in a scientists career. Despite their importance, PIs have not been the focus of empirical investigation and the research eminence play is a significant consideration in awarding grants by funding agencies. The combination of increased level of competition for publicly funded research and a more managerialist approach being adopted by Higher Education Institutions, coupled with industry influences has heightened the expectations associated with the role of PI. This paper provides evidence of the inhibiting factors that Principal Investigators experience in leading collaborative publicly funded national and international research projects as well as the tensions it creates for them. The inhibiting factors that we have unearthed are political and environmental, institutional and project based. We have found the optimal balance for publicly funded PIs of conducting, leading and administrating research is significantly skewed towards administrative and managerial issues. The inhibiting factors that publicly funded PIs experience has the potential to undermine the 'ethos of science (Merton, 1968), research autonomy and the prioritization of discovery by scientists.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCISC Working Papers;41
dc.subjectCISC Working Papersen_US
dc.subjectPublicly funded researchen_US
dc.subjectPrincipal investigatorsen_US
dc.subjectInhibiting factorsen_US
dc.subjectResearch leadershipen_US
dc.subjectResearch managementen_US
dc.subjectEthos of scienceen_US
dc.titleGlorified administrators or eminent research leaders: the inhibiting factors that publicly funded principal investigators experience in leading collaborative research projectsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.local.contactJames Cunningham, Research Institute, Room 340, Cairnes Building, Nui Galway. 3472 Email:

Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record