Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurphy, A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T08:25:49Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T08:25:49Z
dc.date.issued1997-10-01
dc.identifier.citationMurphy, A. (1997). Effect of the introduction of a financial incentive for fee-paying a&e attenders to consult their general practitioner before attending the a&e department. Family Practice 14 (5), 407-410
dc.identifier.issn1460-2229
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/9607
dc.description.abstractBackground. The Health (Out-Patient Charges) Regulations 1994 were designed to encourage those Irish patients liable for their own health care costs to attend their GP before their local Accident and Emergency (A&E) department. Such patients are referred to as General Medical Services (GMS)-ineligible. Prior to the introduction of the regulations in March 1994, there was a perverse financial incentive for these patients to attend directly A&E departments instead of their GP. Objective. The aim was to compare the number of GMS-ineligible patients referred by a GP during the year before and the year after the implementation of the Regulations. Method. This study involved the audit of all new attendances to a large A&E department, for 1 year before and after the introduction of the new regulations. The main outcome measures were the number of new attenders in the subsequent year, the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders, the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders referred by a GP and the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders referred by a GP and categorized as having neither critical nor urgent complaints. Results. The total number of new attenders in the year subsequent to the introduction of the regulations was 45 302, an increase of 4.9% on the previous year's total. The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders decreased from 45.3 to 44% (-1.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI)-0.6 to -1.9). The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders who were referred by a GP increased by 2.4% (95%; CI 1.7-3.1). The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders, referred by a GP with complaints categorized as neither critical nor urgent, increased by 2.5% (95%; CI 1.8-3.2). Conclusions. The introduction of the regulations was associated with a small, but statistically significant, reduction in the number of GMS-ineligible patients who attended with non-emergency conditions. The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders who were referred by a GP increased by 2.4% (95%; CI 1.7-3.1). The overall workload of the A&E department was, however, unaffected. Further evaluation of the effects of this reduction on the health status of patients is required.
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.relation.ispartofFamily Practice
dc.subjecta&e department
dc.subjectgeneral practitioner
dc.subjecthealth care costs
dc.subjectprimary-secondary interface
dc.subjectemergency
dc.titleEffect of the introduction of a financial incentive for fee-paying a&e attenders to consult their general practitioner before attending the a&e department
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/fampra/14.5.407
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://academic.oup.com/fampra/article-pdf/14/5/407/9794295/140407.pdf
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record