An evaluation of the MindOut (2) programme in disadvantaged post-primary schools: A report on preliminary findings
Date
2017-10Author
Dowling, Katherine
Barry, Margaret M.
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 2647 (view details)
Recommended Citation
Dowling, Katherine, & Barry, Margaret M. (2017). An evaluation of the MindOut (2) programme in disadvantaged post-primary schools: A report on preliminary findings. National University of Ireland Galway: Health Promotion Research Centre.
Published Version
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
This report describes the evaluation of the MindOut (2) social and emotional wellbeing
programme for senior level students in Irish post-primary schools. This programme, which
was updated in 2015, is comprised of twelve sessions which are designed using interactive
and student-centred approaches to engage students in promoting their social and emotional
well-being. The Health Promotion Research Centre (HPRC) at NUI, Galway was
commissioned by the HSE to evaluate the implementation of the revised MindOut
programme in disadvantaged post-primary schools.
AIMS
The key aims of the evaluation are to assess:
• The programme impact on students’ (i) social and emotional skills development; (ii)
overall mental health and wellbeing; and (iii) academic performance.
• The views of the participants on the perceived benefits of the programme.
• The attitudes of the teachers regarding the impact of the programme on themselves,
the young people and the wider school community.
• The process of implementation and perceived gains from each session.
• The effects of different levels of implementation on the process of programme
delivery and on the outcomes achieved.
METHODS
A cluster randomised control trial (RCT) design was employed to determine the programme
outcomes with assessments before (T1) and immediately after implementation (T2). This
intervention study employs a mixed-methods design with the use of both quantitative and
qualitative methods to assess programme outcomes and the implementation process. Baseline
measures were taken approximately one to two weeks before programme implementation
within each school and post-intervention measures were collected immediately following
programme delivery. Process measures were employed during and after programme
implementation.