Healthcare staffs' experiences and perceptions of caring for people with dementia in the acute setting: qualitative evidence synthesis

View/ Open
Date
2016-06-09Author
Houghton, Catherine
Murphy, Kathy
Brooker, Dawn
Casey, Dympna
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 761 (view details)
Cited 58 times in Scopus (view citations)
Recommended Citation
Houghton, C., Murphy, K., Brooker, D., Casey, D.,Healthcare Staffs’ Experiences and Perceptions of Caring for People with Dementia in the Acute Setting: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, International Journal of Nursing Studies (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.06.001
Published Version
Abstract
Background: Dementia is a global issue, with increasing prevalence rates impacting on
health services internationally. People with dementia are frequently admitted to hospital,
an environment that may not be suited to their needs. While many initiatives have been
developed to improve their care in the acute setting, there is a lack of cohesive
understanding of how staff experience and perceive the care they give to people with
dementia in the acute setting.
Objectives: The aim of this qualitative synthesis was to explore health care staffs’
experiences and perceptions of caring for people with dementia in the acute setting.
Qualitative synthesis can bring together isolated findings in a meaningful way that can
inform policy development.
Settings: A screening process, using inclusion/exclusion criteria, identified qualitative
studies that focused on health care staff caring for people with dementia in acute settings.
Participants: Twelve reports of nine studies were included for synthesis. Data extraction
was conducted on each report by two researchers.
Methods: Framework synthesis was employed using VIPS framework, using Values,
Individualised, Perspective and Social and psychological as concepts to guide synthesis.
The VIPS framework has previously been used for exploring approaches to caring for
people with dementia. Quality appraisal was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills
Programme (CASP) and NVivo facilitated sensitivity analysis to ensure confidence in the
findings.
Results: Key themes, derived from VIPS, included a number of specific subthemes that
examined: infrastructure and care pathways, person-centred approaches to care, how the
person interacts with their environment and other patients, and family involvement in
care decisions. The synthesis identified barriers to appropriate care for the person with
dementia. These include ineffective pathways of care, unsuitable environments,
inadequate resources and staffing levels and lack of emphasis on education and training
for staff caring for people with dementia.
Conclusions: This review has identified key issues in the care of people with dementia in
the acute setting: improving pathways of care, creating suitable environments, addressing resources and staffing levels and placing emphasis on the education for staff caring for
people with dementia. Recommendations are made for practice consideration, policy
development and future research. Leadership is required to instil the values needed to care
for this client group in an effective and personcentred way. Qualitative evidence synthesis
can inform policy and in this case, recommends VIPS as a suitable framework for guiding
decisions around care for people with dementia in acute settings.