Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHealy, Mark G.
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Maria
dc.contributor.authorSerrenho, Ana
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-10T10:51:33Z
dc.date.available2014-11-10T10:51:33Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-29
dc.identifier.citationHealy, M.G., Barrett, M., Lanigan, G., Serrenho, A., Ibrahim, T.G., Thornton, S.F., Rolfe, S.A., Huang, W.E., Fenton, O. (2014) 'Optimizing nitrate removal and evaluating pollution swapping trade-offs from laboratory denitrification bioreactors'. Ecological Engineering, 74 :290-301.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/4723
dc.descriptionJournal articleen_US
dc.description.abstractDenitrification bioreactors, typically containing woodchips, are artificial sinks used to remediate nitrate (NO3-) losses on agricultural landscapes. Analysis of these bioreactors frequently considers their efficacy in terms of only a single contaminant (for example, NO3-), but does not consider other losses ammonium (NH4+), phosphorus (PO43-), methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O). In this study, laboratory-scale denitrifying bioreactors operated at hydraulic retention times (HRTs) ranging from 4 to 22 d, containing either lodgepole pine woodchips (LPW), lodgepole pine needles (LPN), barley straw (BBS) or cardboard, were investigated to elucidate operational optima considering three scenarios using: (1) only NO3- net fluxes (2) NO3-, NH4+ and PO43- combined fluxes (3) all fluxes (water and gaseous) combined. At the end of the experiment, after up to 745 days of operation, the bioreactors were destructively sampled for microbial analysis. In Scenario 1, there was a net removal in the bioreactors, which generally performed best at shorter HRTs. In Scenario 2, there was a net release of contaminants from all bioreactors, which substantially increased in Scenario 3. Total greenhouse gas emissions were highest for the cardboard bioreactors (296 g CO2-eq m-2 d-1) at the longest HRT, and were dominated by CH4 emissions. Highest N2O emissions emanated from LPN and LPW bioreactors, which also had a greater proportion of denitrifiers than the other bioreactors. Overall, considering all three scenarios, LPN bioreactors were the best performing at all HRTs. However, the long-term availability of its carbon source may be limited, as there was an 80% reduction over a 560 d period.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food - Research Stimulus Programme 2007 (RSF 07 525)en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Engineeringen
dc.subjectDenitrificationen_US
dc.subjectBioreactorsen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emissionsen_US
dc.subjectPollution swappingen_US
dc.titleOptimizing nitrate removal and evaluating pollution swapping trade-offs from laboratory denitrification bioreactorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2014-11-10T08:32:55Z
dc.local.publishedsourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.005en_US
dc.description.peer-reviewedpeer-reviewed
dc.contributor.funder|~|Dept of Agriculture & Food |~|
dc.internal.rssid7612097
dc.local.contactMark Healy, Dept. Of Civil Engineering, Room E210, Civil Engineering Building, Nui Galway. 5364 Email: mark.healy@nuigalway.ie
dc.local.copyrightcheckedYes
dc.local.versionACCEPTED
nui.item.downloads451


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record