Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelleher, Cecily
dc.contributor.authorFriel, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorNic Gabhainn, Saoirse
dc.contributor.authorTay, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-24T12:31:22Z
dc.date.available2011-11-24T12:31:22Z
dc.date.issued2003-02-21
dc.identifier.citationKelleher, C. C., Friel, S., Nic Gabhainn, S., & Tay, J. B. (2003). Socio-demographic predictors of self-rated health in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the National Survey on Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition, SLAN. Social Science & Medicine, 57(3), 477-486.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/2346
dc.description.abstractThough Ireland continues to have a poor health profile compared with other European Union countries, previous research on social variations has been limited. For the first time in the Republic of Ireland, the influence on self-rated health of various socio-demographic indicators was assessed in a multi-variate logistic regression model, separately for men and women. Data were from the first National Survey of Lifestyles, Attitudes and Nutrition, SLAN, conducted by post in a multi-stage, cluster random sample across 26 counties. There were 6539 respondents (45.4% males). Mean selfrated health differed significantly according to age, marital status, tenure, educational status, social class, household size and eligibility for general medical services (GMS), but not according to gender or rurality. There were also differences if residing in a district with low level of affluence, or according to social cluster groupings. There were numerous significant correlations between the nine socio-demographic measures, but the most consistent pattern was between GMS eligibility and the various indicators, for both men and women. In the case of men, whether social class was included in the multi-variate model or not, education status remained predictive in the final model, (OR2.36 CI 1.35-4.12) as did smoking status (OR2.11 CI 1.47-3.02). Odds ratio for GMS eligibility was 3.33 (CI 2.61-4.26) attenuated to 1.70 (CI 1.12-2.56) in the final model. For women the pattern was somewhat different. Only GMS status (OR2.64 CI 1.74-3.99) and level of education (2.25 CI 1.19-4.24) were predictive in the final model. A multi-level analysis showed that area level of affluence was not significantly predictive of self-rated health when individual level factors were taken into account.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectSelf-rated healthen_US
dc.subjectEducation statusen_US
dc.subjectSocial classen_US
dc.subjectEmploymenten_US
dc.subjectTenureen_US
dc.subjectIrelanden_US
dc.subjectHealth Promotionen_US
dc.titleSocio-demographic predictors of self-rated health in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the National Survey on Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition, SLANen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.local.publishedsourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00371-4en_US
dc.description.peer-reviewedpeer-revieweden_US
dc.contributor.funderDepartment of Health and Childrenen_US
dc.contributor.funderHigher Education Authorityen_US
nui.item.downloads900


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record