Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPower, Martin
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Charlotte
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T12:07:51Z
dc.date.available2022-06-14T12:07:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPower, Martin, & Burke, Charlotte. (2021). Recruitment and retention in social care work in Ireland: A Social Care Ireland survey. Dublin: Social Care Ireland.en_IE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/17206
dc.description.abstractAs the first decade of the new millennium drew to a close, concerns were raised around the “dramatic growth in Higher Education social care programme providers since 2002” and the conclusion was reached that social care work could not “possibly absorb” the number of graduates annually and that this situation was thus “unsustainable” (Lalor, 2009, p. 1). It might seem almost ironic then that by the end of the second decade of the new millennium there were rumblings of recruitment and retention challenges within social care work. Certainly, TUSLA the child and family agency experienced substantial difficulties in this regard. In the period between 2015 and 2019 for example, TUSLA experienced a 30% increase in referrals, but only a 1% increase in the social care workforce, with agency workers being increasingly utilised to bolster service provision (Clarke & McMahon, 2020). In the allied profession of social work, similar problems were experienced and much of the explanation for the recruitment and retention challenges in securing social workers focused on a limited graduate pool and immigration challenges (Clarke & McMahon, 2020). If the “dramatic growth” in social care graduates can be taken to suggest strongly that shortages in supply due to a limited pool to recruit from was unlikely to be a constraining factor in social care, then explanations for issues surrounding recruitment and retention must be sought elsewhere. This is not to suggest that supply side considerations do not undoubtable play some part. Indeed, recruitment and retention of workers in social services has been highlighted as a concern throughout the EU (Lethbridge, 2017) and in Ireland the austerity period was especially challenging for the health and social care sector. A combination of funding cuts, embargos and moratoriums on recruitment, as well as demands for work practice changes and increased privatisation through contracting out meant that there were often combined pressures of increasing unemployment or underemployment, and a deterioration in conditions of employment (Cantwell & Power, 2016; Dukelow & Kennet, 2018; Mahon, 2016; Murphy, 2017). Unsurprisingly therefore in the austerity era the tap of emigration turned on once again and educated young people left in droves (Gilmartin, 2017; Glynn et al., 2013). Nonetheless, with Ireland rebounding out of the Great Recession in the later period of the 2010s and the labour marketing tightening, CORU noted in 2019 that there were 14 educational providers providing some 34 social care programmes/pathways into social care work. As such, supply had clearly not diminished in the intervening period and any explanation for recruitment and retention concerns must therefore to be located on the demand side of the equation (Kennedy & Kennedy-Burke, 2018; CORU, 2019). If there was a “dramatic growth” is supply at the turn of the millennium there has arguably been a similar, though less extensive, growth in demand over the last two decades. Certainly, social care work has expanded beyond the traditional arenas of residential care for children and individuals with disabilities and social care work now takes place in an increasing diverse range of services, including addiction, homelessness and migrant services to name but a few (Byrne, 2016; McGarr & Fingleton, 2020; Mulkeen, 2020). At the same time, it must be acknowledged that recruitment and retention to any field are impacted by wider factors. Affordable childcare for example, remains a particular challenge in Ireland, especially where there are irregular work patterns and unsociable hours (Murphy, 2017; Russel et al., 2018). Given that both are features of social care work and that the social care workforce is overwhelmingly female, such influences cannot but impact recruitment and retention. In a similar fashion, upwardly spiralling rents and house prices and cost of living increases, as well as inflationary pressures often fanned the flames of industrial unrest, especially in the health and social care sectors (Lyons, 2021; McQuinn, 2017). In 2019 for instance, nurses, healthcare workers and support staff all took to the picket lines in disputes over pay and conditions, and concerns around recruitment and retention (Miley, 2019a & b; Wall, 2019). Against this backdrop, and with concerns emerging of a potentially looming recruitment and retention crisis in social care work, Social Care Ireland undertook this study to examine work patterns, the extent to which there was a practice of offering lower grade pay and conditions in recruitment, and, most importantly, what social care workers themselves viewed as the ‘greatest challenges in recruiting and retaining social care workers’.en_IE
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_IE
dc.language.isoenen_IE
dc.publisherSocial Care Irelanden_IE
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectsocial care worken_IE
dc.subjectrecruitmenten_IE
dc.subjectretentionen_IE
dc.titleRecruitment and retention in social care work in Ireland: A Social Care Ireland surveyen_IE
dc.typeReporten_IE
dc.date.updated2022-06-14T09:25:31Z
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://socialcareireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Recruitment-and-retention-report-SCI.pdfen_IE
dc.description.peer-reviewednon-peer-reviewed
dc.internal.rssid27423957
dc.local.contactMartin Power, Health Promotion & Hprc, Room 103a, Aras Moyola, Nui Galway. 2157 Email: martin.p.power@nuigalway.ie
dc.local.copyrightcheckedYes
dc.local.versionPUBLISHED
nui.item.downloads95


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IE
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IE