Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRindorf, Anna
dc.contributor.authorMumford, John
dc.contributor.authorBaranowski, Paul
dc.contributor.authorClausen, Lotte Worsøe
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Dorleta
dc.contributor.authorHintzen, Niels T.
dc.contributor.authorKempf, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorLeach, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorLevontin, Polina
dc.contributor.authorMace, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorMackinson, Steven
dc.contributor.authorMaravelias, Christos
dc.contributor.authorPrellezo, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorQuetglas, Antoni
dc.contributor.authorTserpes, George
dc.contributor.authorVoss, Rüdiger
dc.contributor.authorReid, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:22:52Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:22:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-01
dc.identifier.citationRindorf, Anna; Mumford, John; Baranowski, Paul; Clausen, Lotte Worsøe; García, Dorleta; Hintzen, Niels T. Kempf, Alexander; Leach, Adrian; Levontin, Polina; Mace, Pamela; Mackinson, Steven; Maravelias, Christos; Prellezo, Raúl; Quetglas, Antoni; Tserpes, George; Voss, Rüdiger; Reid, David (2017). Moving beyond the msy concept to reflect multidimensional fisheries management objectives. Marine Policy 85 , 33-41
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/13656
dc.description.abstractMaximising the long term average catch of single stock fisheries as prescribed by the globally-legislated MSY objective is unlikely to ensure ecosystem, economic, social and governance sustainability unless an effort is made to explicitly include these considerations. We investigated how objectives to be maximised can be combined with sustainability constraints aiming specifically at one or more of these four sustainability pillars. The study was conducted as a three-year interactive process involving 290 participating science, industry, NGO and management representatives from six different European regions. Economic considerations and inclusive governance were generally preferred as the key objectives to be maximised in complex fisheries, recognising that ecosystem, social and governance constraints are also key aspects of sustainability in all regions. Relative preferences differed between regions and cases but were similar across a series of workshops, different levels of information provided and the form of elicitation methods used as long as major shifts in context or stakeholder composition did not occur. Maximising inclusiveness in governance, particularly the inclusiveness of affected stakeholders, was highly preferred by participants across the project. This suggests that advice incorporating flexibility in the interpretation of objectives to leave room for meaningful inclusiveness in decision-making processes is likely to be a prerequisite for stakeholder buy-in to management decisions.
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofMarine Policy
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectsustainability pillars
dc.subjectinclusive governance
dc.subjectmsy
dc.subjectmey
dc.subjectmsoy
dc.subjectmanagement objectives
dc.subjectmaximum sustainable-yield
dc.subjecttrade-offs
dc.subjectstrategy evaluation
dc.subjectreference points
dc.subjectpolicy
dc.subjectconservation
dc.subjectecosystems
dc.subjectimplementation
dc.titleMoving beyond the msy concept to reflect multidimensional fisheries management objectives
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012
dc.local.publishedsourcehttp://orbit.dtu.dk/files/134786671/Postprint.pdf
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland