Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPriebe, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorMatanov, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorSchor, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorStraßmayr, Christa
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Henrique
dc.contributor.authorBarry, Margaret M.
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Olalla, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGabor, Edina
dc.contributor.authorGreacen, Tim
dc.contributor.authorHolcnerová, Petra
dc.contributor.authorKluge, Ulrike
dc.contributor.authorLorant, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorMoskalewicz, Jacek
dc.contributor.authorSchene, Aart H
dc.contributor.authorMacassa, Gloria
dc.contributor.authorGaddini, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:21:56Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:21:56Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-28
dc.identifier.citationPriebe, Stefan; Matanov, Aleksandra; Schor, Ruth; Straßmayr, Christa; Barros, Henrique; Barry, Margaret M; Díaz-Olalla, José Manuel; Gabor, Edina; Greacen, Tim; Holcnerová, Petra; Kluge, Ulrike; Lorant, Vincent; Moskalewicz, Jacek; Schene, Aart H; Macassa, Gloria; Gaddini, Andrea (2012). Good practice in mental health care for socially marginalised groups in europe: a qualitative study of expert views in 14 countries. BMC Public Health 12 ,
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/13523
dc.description.abstractBackground: Socially marginalised groups tend to have higher rates of mental disorders than the general population and can be difficult to engage in health care. Providing mental health care for these groups represents a particular challenge, and evidence on good practice is required. This study explored the experiences and views of experts in 14 European countries regarding mental health care for six socially marginalised groups: long-term unemployed; street sex workers; homeless; refugees/asylum seekers; irregular migrants and members of the travelling communities. Methods: Two highly deprived areas were selected in the capital cities of 14 countries, and experts were interviewed for each of the six marginalised groups. Semi-structured interviews with case vignettes were conducted to explore experiences of good practice and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: In a total of 154 interviews, four components of good practice were identified across all six groups: a) establishing outreach programmes to identify and engage with individuals with mental disorders; b) facilitating access to services that provide different aspects of health care, including mental health care, and thus reducing the need for further referrals; c) strengthening the collaboration and co-ordination between different services; and d) disseminating information on services both to marginalised groups and to practitioners in the area. Conclusions: Experts across Europe hold similar views on what constitutes good practice in mental health care for marginalised groups. Care may be improved through better service organisation, coordination and information.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectmarginalisation
dc.subjectmental health care
dc.subjecthealth care systems
dc.subjectgood practice
dc.subjectautonomy
dc.subjectwestern countries
dc.subjectmeta-regression
dc.subjectprofessionals
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectmigrants
dc.subjecthomeless
dc.subjectpeople
dc.titleGood practice in mental health care for socially marginalised groups in europe: a qualitative study of expert views in 14 countries
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-12-248
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-12-248?site=bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland