• Login
    ARAN - Access to Research at NUI Galway
    View Item 
    •   ARAN Home
    • Support Services
    • Externally hosted open access publications with NUI Galway authors (2)
    • View Item
    •   ARAN Home
    • Support Services
    • Externally hosted open access publications with NUI Galway authors (2)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ARANCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Help

    How to submit and FAQs

    Threat appeals in health communication: messages that elicit fear and enhance perceived efficacy positively impact on young male drivers

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text
    Date
    2016-07-27
    Author
    Carey, Rachel N.
    Sarma, Kiran M.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Usage
    This item's downloads: 0 (view details)
    Cited 14 times in Scopus (view citations)
    
    Recommended Citation
    Carey, Rachel N. Sarma, Kiran M. (2016). Threat appeals in health communication: messages that elicit fear and enhance perceived efficacy positively impact on young male drivers. BMC Public Health 16 ,
    Published Version
    http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3227-2
    Abstract
    Background: Health communications often present graphic, threat-based representations of the potential consequences of health-risk behaviours. These 'threat appeals' feature prominently in public health campaigns, but their use is controversial, with studies investigating their efficacy reporting inconsistent, and often negative, findings. This research examined the impact of a threat-based road safety advertisement on the driving behaviour of young male drivers. Methods: To address limitations of previous research, we first identified a road safety advertisement that objectively and subjectively elicited fear using physiological and subjective measures. Study 1 (n = 62) examined the effect of this advertisement, combined with a manipulation designed to increase perceived efficacy, on speed choice. Study 2 (n = 81) investigated whether a state emotion, anger, impacts on the effectiveness of the advertisement in changing four distinct driving behaviours. Both studies examined short-term effects only. Results: Study 1 findings indicated that a high threat message, when combined with high perceived efficacy, can lead to a decrease in speed choice. Study 2 results suggested that increased levels of state anger may counteract the potential value of combining fear-arousing threats and efficacy-building messages. Conclusions: Findings suggest that threat-based road safety communications that target affective (fear) and cognitive (perceived efficacy) mechanisms can positively affect driving behaviours. State emotions, such as anger, may negatively impact on the effectiveness of the message. Taken together, these findings provide additional support for the use of efficacy-building messages in threat-based communications, but highlight the need for further research into the complex array of affective influences on driving.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10379/10694
    Collections
    • Externally hosted open access publications with NUI Galway authors (2)
    • Copyright @ NUI Galway
    • Library
    • NUI Galway