Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrowne, Ann Michelle
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Carmel Geraldine
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, Collette
dc.contributor.authorNiMhuircheartaigh, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Joseph M.
dc.contributor.authorBruzzi, John F.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:01:47Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-01
dc.identifier.citationBrowne, Ann Michelle; Cronin, Carmel Geraldine; English, Collette; NiMhuircheartaigh, Jennifer; Murphy, Joseph M. Bruzzi, John F. (2010). Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in oncology patients undergoing routine computed tomography imaging. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 5 (6), 798-803
dc.identifier.issn1556-0864
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/10560
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Clinically unsuspected pulmonary embolism (PE) can be detected in oncology patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) imaging for reasons other than for PE diagnosis, but there is little prospective data on its true prevalence, clinical importance, or on methods to improve detection. Methods: In consecutive oncology patients undergoing CT imaging of the chest for indications other than PE detection, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was systematically included as part of the imaging protocol. Each imaging study was prospectively analyzed for the presence of PE. A 6-month follow-up was performed. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Results: Four hundred seven oncology patients were included. Indications for chest CT imaging included baseline staging (31%), restaging after therapy (53%), routine surveillance (15%), or assessment of extrathoracic disease (1%). Clinically unsuspected PE were detected in 18 patients (4.4%). The prevalence of unsuspected PE was 6.4% among inpatients and 3.4% among outpatients. PE was more prevalent among patients with metastatic disease (7% versus 2%, p = 0.007) and in patients who had received recent chemotherapy (11% versus 3%, p = 0.008). In 7 (39%) of the 18 patients with clinically unsuspected PE, emboli were only identifiable on the CTPA study and not on the routine chest CT study. The diagnosis of PE led to immediate changes in patient management. Conclusion: Clinically unsuspected PE is present in up to 4.4% of oncology patients undergoing CT imaging for indications other than PE diagnosis. Modifying standard CT imaging protocols to include a CTPA examination optimizes their detection and leads to changes in patient management.
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Thoracic Oncology
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectpulmonary embolism
dc.subjectoncology
dc.subjectct pulmonary angiogram
dc.subjectmdct
dc.subjectvenous thromboembolism
dc.subjectnatural-history
dc.subjectct angiography
dc.subjectrisk-factors
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectcancer
dc.subjectlung
dc.subjectmdct
dc.titleUnsuspected pulmonary emboli in oncology patients undergoing routine computed tomography imaging
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/jto.0b013e3181d6153a
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0b013e3181d6153a
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland