Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Jodi
dc.contributor.authorPassant, Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorGroza, Tudor
dc.contributor.authorBreslin, John G.
dc.identifier.citationJodi Schneider, Alexandre Passant, Tudor Groza, John G. Breslin,(2010) 'Argumentation 3.0: how Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environments' In COMMA 2010, Desenzano del Garda, Italy,en_US
dc.description.abstractArgumentative discussions are common in Web 2.0 applications, but the social Web still offers limited or no explicit support for argumentation. As Web 2.0 applications become more popular, modeling argumentation happening in these systems becomes important, to enable reuse and further understanding of online discussions. After reviewing four genres of online conversations¿Web bulletin boards,Wiki talk pages, blog comments, and microblogs¿and four current Web 2.0 argumentation systems, the paper suggests how Semantic Web technologies can be used to provide an interoperability layer for argumentation modeling across applicationsen_US
dc.subjectInformal argumentationen_US
dc.subjectSocial networkingen_US
dc.subjectArgumentation toolsen_US
dc.subjectSemantic Weben_US
dc.subjectDistributed conversationsen_US
dc.subjectDigital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)en_US
dc.titleArgumentation 3.0: how Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environmentsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US

Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record