Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Ursula
dc.identifier.citationConnolly, U. (2008) 'Paternity Fraud and the Tort of Deceit'. Quarterly Review of Tort Law, 24.en_IE
dc.description.abstractRecent cases in England, Australia and the United States have seen efforts to expand the tort of deceit to allow a remedy in cases of paternity fraud. The tort of deceit has traditionally applied to commercial transactions and the divergent approaches taken by both the English and Australian courts point to the complexity of applying it to domestic arrangements. In England the tort was successfully applied to two cases involving cohabiting couples, P v B1 and A v B. 2 Meanwhile, the Australian High Court rejected the application of such a tort to a married couple in Magill v Magill3 largely on the basis that the court refused to apply the tort to representations relating to sexual fidelity. This article proposes to examine these cases and consider to what extent they are relevant to an Irish court. It will also briefly question whether the current emphasis on the biological parent is correct and whether courts should instead eschew the biological model in favour of the social model of parenthood, which arguably better reflects the best interests of the child.en_IE
dc.publisherClarus Pressen_IE
dc.relation.ispartofQuarterly Review of Tort Lawen
dc.subjectPaternity frauden_IE
dc.titlePaternity fraud and the tort of deceiten_IE
dc.local.contactUrsula Connolly, Dept. Of Law, Room 513, Tower 2, Arts/Science Building, Nui Galway. 3250 Email:

Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record