Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Ursula
dc.identifier.citationConnolly, U. (2007) 'Corr v IBC - Civil Liability and Employee Suicide'. Quarterly Review of Tort Law, 2 (3).en_IE
dc.description.abstractThe English Court of Appeal decision in Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd1 held that an employer could be found liable for the suicide of an employee. 2 Sedley and Wilson LJJ (with Ward LJ dissenting) overturned the trial court decision of Baker J. who had held that suicide was not a foreseeable kind of harm for which the employer could be held liable. The majority held that suicide did not have to be foreseeable as a different ‘kind of damage’, it would suffice that the depressive illness which gave rise to the suicide was foreseeable. This was based on the acceptance by the majority that suicide is a type of harm which flows from a depressive illness. The Court also held that suicide did not automatically attract the qualities of a novus actus interveniens so as to break the chain of causationen_IE
dc.publisherClarus Pressen_IE
dc.relation.ispartofQuarterly Review of Tort Lawen
dc.subjectCorr v IBCen_IE
dc.subjectCivil liabilityen_IE
dc.subjectEmployee suicideen_IE
dc.titleCorr v IBC - Civil liability and employee suicideen_IE
dc.local.contactUrsula Connolly, Dept. Of Law, Room 513, Tower 2, Arts/Science Building, Nui Galway. 3250 Email:

Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record