Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Paddy
dc.contributor.authorCallan, Aoife
dc.contributor.authorO'Shea, Eamon
dc.contributor.authorDuane, Sinead
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Andrew W.
dc.contributor.authorDomegan, Christine
dc.contributor.authorGalvin, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorVellinga, Akke
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-28T08:26:50Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-27
dc.identifier.citationPaddy Gillespie, Aoife Callan, Eamon O'Shea, Sinead Duane, Andrew W. Murphy, Christine Domegan, Sandra Galvin, Akke Vellinga (2016) 'The cost effectiveness of the SIMPle intervention to improve antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection in primary care'. Journal of Public Health, 1-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw102en_IE
dc.identifier.issn1741-3850
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/6610
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health issue. This study examines the cost effectiveness of the SIMPle (Supporting the Improvement and Management of Prescribing for Urinary Tract Infections (UTI)) intervention to improve antimicrobial prescribing in primary care in Ireland. Methods An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a cluster randomized controlled trial of 30 general practices and 2560 patients with a diagnosis of UTI. Practices were randomized to the usual practice control or the SIMPle intervention (arm A or B). Data at 6 months follow-up were used to estimate incremental costs, incremental effectiveness in terms of first-line antimicrobial prescribing for UTI and cost effectiveness acceptability curves. Results The SIMPle intervention was, on average, more costly and more effective than the control. The probability of intervention arm A being cost effective was 0.280, 0.995 and 1.000 at threshold values of €50, €150 and €250 per percentage point increase in first-line antimicrobial prescribing respectively. The equivalent probabilities for intervention arm B were 0.121, 0.863 and 0.985, respectively. Conclusions The cost effectiveness of the SIMPle intervention depends on the value placed on improving antimicrobial prescribing. Future studies should examine the wider and longer term costs and outcomes of improving antimicrobial prescribing.en_IE
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_IE
dc.language.isoenen_IE
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_IE
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Public Healthen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectEconomicsen_IE
dc.subjectPrimary careen_IE
dc.subjectPublic healthen_IE
dc.subjectUrinary tract infectionen_IE
dc.subjectCost effectivenessen_IE
dc.subjectFollow upen_IE
dc.subjectIrelanden_IE
dc.subjectAnti microbialsen_IE
dc.subjectPrescribingen_IE
dc.titleThe cost effectiveness of the SIMPle intervention to improve antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection in primary careen_IE
dc.typeArticleen_IE
dc.date.updated2017-06-16T07:02:40Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pubmed/fdw102
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw102en_IE
dc.description.peer-reviewedpeer-reviewed
dc.contributor.funder|~|
dc.description.embargo2017-09-27
dc.internal.rssid11396524
dc.local.contactAkke Vellinga, General Practice/Bacteriology, Nui Galway. 5192 Email: akke.vellinga@nuigalway.ie
dc.local.copyrightcheckedNo
dc.local.versionACCEPTED
nui.item.downloads1037


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland