Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTilley, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorPacious, Kathleen
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-11T12:37:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/6054
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South, Charles Dickens’s Our Mutual Friend, and George Eliot’s Daniel Deronda through the lens of rhetorical narratology to offer conclusions for realism, metafiction, and the ethics of reading. The thesis highlights the existing gap between narratology and ethics and contributes to developing a framework of ethical narratology. The introduction asks the following research questions: 1. How do fictional narratives invite a response from readers and in what way is this ethical? 2. What are the implications of the interplay between textual and readerly dynamics for the genre of realism? 3. What is the relationship between the ethics of the telling and heterodiegetic (noncharacter) narration? 4. How we can foreground the ethical effects of narratives without veering into empirical methodologies? 5. How can mimetic and synthetic strategies work together to create a more enhanced invitation and reading experience for the reader? The literature review develops the theoretical framework of narrative theory, realism, empathy, and ethics. Chapter three focuses on sympathy, mutual focalization, and intermental thought in North and South. Chapter four explores the misdirections and delayed disclosures that make up the ethics of the telling in Our Mutual Friend. Chapter five demonstrates the ethical consequences of temporal ordering in Daniel Deronda. The conclusion suggests that readers’ judgments of characters, narrators, implied authors, and themselves are the bridge between realism and ethics. Judgment relies on distance created through techniques that are both immersive and defamiliarizing and that accentuate mimetic and synthetic reading strategies. Interaction with these techniques depends on reconfiguration, highlighting the crucial role of readers as agents of closure for the realist novel. Reconfiguration offers ethical rewards which can be discussed through a metahermeneutic language of invitation, expectation, and response. Ultimately, this thesis offers readers a set of tools to negotiate the value of literature.en_IE
dc.subjectNarratologyen_IE
dc.subjectEthicsen_IE
dc.subjectCharles Dickensen_IE
dc.subjectElizabeth Gaskellen_IE
dc.subjectGeorge Elioten_IE
dc.subjectEmpathyen_IE
dc.subjectSympathyen_IE
dc.subjectNarration (Rhetoric)en_IE
dc.subjectFictionen_IE
dc.subjectEnglish Fiction - 19th Centuryen_IE
dc.subjectPoeticsen_IE
dc.subjectReadingen_IE
dc.subjectLiterary Ethicsen_IE
dc.subjectNorth and Southen_IE
dc.subjectOur Mutual Frienden_IE
dc.subjectDaniel Derondaen_IE
dc.subjectEnglishen_IE
dc.subjectNarrative theoryen_IE
dc.subjectNarrative formen_IE
dc.subjectNarrationen_IE
dc.subjectRhetoricen_IE
dc.subjectEnglish fiction - 19th centuryen_IE
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_IE
dc.subjectLiteratureen_IE
dc.subjectLiterary ethicsen_IE
dc.titleThe ethics of narrative form in Gaskell, Dickens, and Elioten_IE
dc.typeThesisen_IE
dc.contributor.funderIrish Research Councilen_IE
dc.contributor.funderCollege of Arts, Social Sciences, and Celtic Studies Galway Doctoral Research Scholarshipen_IE
dc.local.noteThe Ethics of Narrative Form in Gaskell, Dickens, and Elioten_IE
dc.description.embargo2020-10-04
dc.local.finalYesen_IE
nui.item.downloads11


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record