Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcSharry, Jennifer
dc.identifier.citationDaker-White, G,Hays, R,McSharry, J,Giles, S,Cheraghi-Sohi, S,Rhodes, P,Sanders, C (2015) 'Blame the Patient, Blame the Doctor or Blame the System? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies of Patient Safety in Primary Care'. Plos One, 10 .en_IE
dc.description.abstractObjectiveStudies of patient safety in health care have traditionally focused on hospital medicine. However, recent years have seen more research located in primary care settings which have different features compared to secondary care. This study set out to synthesize published qualitative research concerning patient safety in primary care in order to build a conceptual model.MethodMeta-ethnography, an interpretive synthesis method whereby third order interpretations are produced that best describe the groups of findings contained in the reports of primary studies.ResultsForty-eight studies were included as 5 discrete subsets where the findings were translated into one another: patients' perspectives of safety, staff perspectives of safety, medication safety, systems or organisational issues and the primary/secondary care interface. The studies were focused predominantly on issues seen to either improve or compromise patient safety. These issues related to the characteristics or behaviour of patients, staff or clinical systems and interactions between staff, patients and staff, or people and systems. Electronic health records, protocols and guidelines could be seen to both degrade and improve patient safety in different circumstances. A conceptual reading of the studies pointed to patient safety as a subjective feeling or judgement grounded in moral views and with potentially hidden psychological consequences affecting care processes and relationships. The main threats to safety appeared to derive from 'grand' systems issues, for example involving service accessibility, resources or working hours which may not be amenable to effective intervention by individual practices or health workers, especially in the context of a public health system.ConclusionOverall, the findings underline the human elements in patient safety primary health care. The key to patient safety lies in effective face-to-face communication between patients and health care staff or between the different staff involved in the care of an individual patient. Electronic systems can compromise safety when they override the opportunities for face-to-face communication. The circumstances under which guidelines or protocols are seen to either compromise or improve patient safety needs further investigation.en_IE
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) through a patient safety centres research grant. The funder’s web site is
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_IE
dc.relation.ispartofPlos Oneen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.subjectPrimary health careen_IE
dc.subjectMedical errorsen_IE
dc.subjectAdverse eventsen_IE
dc.subjectPreliminary taxonomyen_IE
dc.subjectFamily physiciansen_IE
dc.subjectGeneral practiceen_IE
dc.titleBlame the patient, blame the doctor or blame the system? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of patient safety in primary careen_IE
dc.local.contactJennifer Mcsharry, School Of Psychology, Ambe - Room 2061, Arts Millennium Building Extension, Nui Galway. 5754 Email:
dc.local.copyrightcheckedYes PLOS ONE is an open access journal.

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland