The right to a healthy environment: a rights based approach to environmental issues
MetadataShow full item record
This item's downloads: 3504 (view details)
This thesis analyses the Right to a Healthy Environment (RHE) and identifies the added value of rights-based approaches (RBAs) in the broader context of sustainable development. It focuses particularly on the requirement for ‘meaningful participation’ and how a rights-based approach can provide a means to reconcile environmental protection, social development and economic activities. There is an existing consensus over the strong connection between human rights and the environment, but different approaches are used to advance environmental claims in the current human rights framework. Regional approaches have been particularly helpful in contextualizing environmental claims, and adopting different rights-based approaches to environmental protection. Current debates indicate an inclination towards the adoption of the procedural approach, consisting in environmental access rights to information, public participation and justice. The country context of Panama illustrates the opportunities and limitations of the procedural approach to issues of environmental contestation. An in-depth examination of the processes and outcomes of environmental decision-making in four major development projects indicates that the procedural approach cannot deliver substantive outcomes as it stands. This points to a fundamental failure of current RBAs to address environmental protection and sustainable development. ‘Meaningful participation’ is identified as being core to the RHE, but it lacks efficacy within the procedural approach. Public participation has a role in democratizing environmental decision making, but it is also important for promoting rights interdependence, transparency and accountability, and ensuring just distribution of benefits and burdens. The research elaborates on the nature of RBA to the RHE, identifies criteria for procedural rights, and offers a ‘4 As’-based approach to public participation processes in environmental decision making. This research suggests a more expansive interpretation of the RHE that looks to solidarity rights, marking a complementarity with the Right to Development and the recovery of rights indivisibility.
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Empowering children and young people: an access to justice assessment of mental health law and policy Moloney, Catriona (2016-10-08)This thesis aims to comparatively assess the Irish government’s national, international and regional obligations to respect, protect and fulfil children’s access to justice rights under mental health law, policy and ...
Challenging assumptions of vulnerability: the significance of gender in the work, lives and identities of women human rights defenders Lajoie, Amie (2018-02-16)In 1998, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognised Human Rights and Fundamental ...
The Human Rights Triangle: Transnational Corporations, International Human Law and Regional Cooperation in the Context of Development Jason, Snyder (2013-01-29)Following World War II, the allied powers sought to improve global financial stability and ensure that basic rights were codified and protected at the international level. The UN Charter and the Bretton Woods agreements ...