Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRau, Henrike
dc.contributor.authorFox, Emmet
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T15:11:58Z
dc.date.available2014-12-12T15:11:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/4787
dc.description.abstractThis project examines public receptivity to climate change in Ireland and how this receptivity is connected to the structure of Irish society and the translation of 'climate change' into that society. It provides a methodological framework for examining the social dimensions of climate change perceptions and responses built around the socio-cultural theories and methods of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. He viewed practices and power relations, associated with positions within society, as central to the formation of a 'practical apprehension' of the world for the occupants of those positions. This apprehension is made up of dispositions that, functioning predominantly at an unconscious level, guide our behaviour and how we classify issues and the actions of others, including those pertaining to climate change. More specifically my work looks at how different social conditions and power relations contribute to diversified climate change perceptions and responses between certain groups: namely teachers, environmental activists, farmers, businessmen and lower economic groups. My thesis also investigates how research participants contribute to their own climate change receptivity. The thesis demonstrates how inputting the social into research on climate change receptivity highlights the unequal access to choice that participants have towards engaging with climate change. It reveals a powerful connection between social distance from dominant culture and the quality of the receptiveness to the high-cultural and technical veneer of dominant depictions of climate change. The data collected points to the role in enhancing climate change engagement of higher expert literacy, socially empowered communities and moral framing and vice versa: the diminutive effect on engagement when these properties are absent. Moreover the dominant reformist approach is depicted here as disenfranchising the role of the general public, tending to individualise their possibilities for involvement. In recognising only their individualised consumer-related forms of decarbonisation reformism greatly limits opportunities for public involvement.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectIrelanden_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectBourdieuen_US
dc.subjectFocus groupsen_US
dc.subjectPublic opinionen_US
dc.subjectPracticesen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionsen_US
dc.subjectMediaen_US
dc.subjectFarmingen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectBusinessen_US
dc.subjectClassen_US
dc.subjectIndividualisationen_US
dc.subjectSymbolic violenceen_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectEconomic growthen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science and Sociologyen_US
dc.titleSociety, Power and Climate Change: A social critique of public climate change receptivity in Irelanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.local.noteExamines the relationship between how representations of 'climate change' are shaped and defined within Irish society and public climate change receptivity. Through focus groups and interviews the research identifies how different social conditions and power relations contribute to diversified appreciations and responses between certain groups towards these representations.en_US
dc.local.finalYesen_US
nui.item.downloads7239


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland