Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRau, Henrike
dc.contributor.authorHynes, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-14T10:22:21Z
dc.date.available2013-11-14T10:22:21Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/3814
dc.description.abstractAnthropogenic climate change and its environmental and social consequences are of increasing concern worldwide. Approaches that advocate a 'greening' of current economic and social systems through technological innovation and development tend to dominate policy responses, particularly in resource-intensive sectors such as transport. Technology is perceived in (over)optimistic terms, with limited evidence of challenges to contemporary growth-centric models of development, production, and consumption that cause climate change, a position that can be labelled as a shallow Ecological Modernisation (EM) approach. Work takes up a considerable portion of people's lives whilst travelling to and from work has become a key feature of everyday mobility in many developed and developing countries. A significant contributor to Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, transport in its current form is deemed to be unsustainable. In a European context, telework - an arrangement that enables employees work from home - has been suggested as a virtual mobility option with the potential to reduce the 'consumption of distance' associated with regular commuting. Given its emphasis on the application of technology to solve environmental problems, the uncritical promotion of telework constitutes a prime example of shallow EM thinking. Despite the prominence of EM rhetoric in climate policy and practice, theoretically informed empirical explorations of its implementation and impacts remain incomplete. Drawing on a multi-method investigation of telework in the Republic of Ireland, this research finds current policy thinking and practice amongst decision-makers to be largely reflective of neo-liberal environmentalism, contributing little to curbing the consumerist impulses of contemporary economic models and lifestyles. The environmental benefits of telework are also questioned, as is the rationale for existing teleworking schemes. This research further asserts that actual and potential environmental gains can conflict with potentially negative implications for fairness, equity and well-being, with teleworkers shouldering a substantial social burden arising from technology-aided changes in work practices.en_US
dc.subjectTeleworken_US
dc.subjectMobilityen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectEcological modernisationen_US
dc.subjectConsumptionen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science and Sociologyen_US
dc.titleMobility Matters: Technology, Telework, and the (Un)sustainable Consumption of Distanceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.funderFunded by the Science, Technology, Research and Innovation for the Environment (STRIVE) Programme 2007 to 2013en_US
dc.local.noteThis research investigates telework in Ireland. It critiques current policy in this area for its overemphasis on technology-induced efficiency and productivity gains, an approach similar to very shallow Ecological Modernisation or neo-liberal environmentalism, and identifies contradictions with wider social and environmental sustainability goals in the areas of work and consumption.en_US
dc.local.finalYesen_US
nui.item.downloads2681


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record