Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMalesevic, Sinisa
dc.contributor.advisorClancy, Mary
dc.contributor.authorStaunton, Carol
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-01T11:53:38Z
dc.date.available2015-06-08T13:41:53Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/3595
dc.description.abstractThis thesis argues that parliamentary discourses on genocide and rape have experienced continuity throughout the twentieth century. This is evident from the repetition of discursive categories within the British Houses of Parliament during the Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902) and the Bosnian War (1992-1995), despite the fact that both conflicts occurred in extremely different political and social contexts. In other words, while historical contexts have changed, certain parliamentary discourses have not. This renders these discourses impractical and inadequate in the face of the current social and political environment. In identifying this trend, this thesis argues that the 'Other', the antithesis to the norm, ensures that certain acts are not recognised as genocide or rape. This in turn means these cases cannot be grieved or redressed because they do not exist as crimes, having not conformed to norms of recognition, thus failing to reach the established 'threshold of authenticity'. Using qualitative research methods, a poststructuralist framework, and a gender frame of analysis throughout, this thesis demonstrates this discursive continuity through a comparative analysis of British parliamentary debates during both wars. Overall, this thesis examines how the parliamentary discourses of these two wars have helped establish and reinforce the construction of the 'Other' which has restricted the confines of the crimes to outside the established thresholds of authenticity'. Using qualitative research methods, a poststructuralist framework, and a gender frame of analysis throughout, this thesis demonstrates this discursive continuity through a comparative analysis of British parliamentary debates during both wars. Overall, this thesis examines how the parliamentary discourses of these two wars have helped establish and reinforce the construction of the 'Other' which has restricted the confines of the crimes to outside the established thresholds of authenticity.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectGenocideen_US
dc.subjectRapeen_US
dc.subjectBritish Parliamentary debatesen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science and Sociologyen_US
dc.titleContextualizing the 'Other': Parliamentary Discourses on Genocide and Rape in late nineteenth and late twentieth century Britainen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.funderIRCHSSen_US
dc.local.finalYesen_US
nui.item.downloads1220


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland