Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCarey, Daniel
dc.contributor.advisorCarney, Cliodhna
dc.contributor.authorAnsaldo, Marina
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-25T09:39:34Z
dc.date.issued2011-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/3348
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the representations of Fortune in Boccaccio's Filostrato, Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde, and Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida. Both in the Middle Ages and in the Renaissance, Fortune was intrinsically connected to Troy's fall. This study argues that Fortune is also central to these three versions of the story of Troilus. The representation of Fortune in Boccaccio's Filostrato has been considered as inconsistent and superficial. This thesis questions this view and argues that the multifaceted portrayal provided in the poem is intentional. What we read on the page is mediated through the characters' viewpoints. In compliance with Medieval Christian doctrine, there is no such thing as Fortune for Boccaccio. The characters' contradictory remarks on the subject have the function of showing their theological confusion. Similarly, in the Troilus the characters' references to Fortune reveal more about their beliefs than about Fortune itself. However, each character has a personally consistent (although erroneous in Boethian terms) understanding of Fortune. Troilus's passivity, Pandarus's endless will to act and plot, and Criseyde's need for a protector can be better appreciated considering their views of Fortune. By examining Chaucer's emphasis on the connection between Troilus's and Troy's predicaments, it will become clear that both are subject to Fortune because of unwise human choices. Thus, Chaucer transcends the determinism latent in the story he inherited. In Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida, the Boethian context appropriate to Boccaccio's and Chaucer's poems gives way to a different conception of Fortune. A careful analysis reveals that Shakespeare consistently uses the image of the Renaissance Occasion to deal with agency. Opportunism and brute force are essential to seize Occasion by the forelock, which is the only way to succeed in the world of the play, where valour, honour and chivalry have become obsolete vestiges of a lost mythical past.en_US
dc.subjectComparative Literatureen_US
dc.subjectChauceren_US
dc.subjectShakespeareen_US
dc.subjectBoccaccioen_US
dc.subjectFortuneen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.titleFortune and the Troilus and Cressida Story; A Study of the Representations and Functions of Fortune in Boccaccio's Filostrato, Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde and Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressidaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.funderIRCHSSen_US
dc.contributor.funderDept of English, NUIGen_US
dc.local.noteThis thesis applies a stylistic analysis to the shifting representations of Fortune in Boccaccio's Filostrato, Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde and Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida, establishing the importance of the portrayal of Fortune in these texts in relation to characterisation and the problem of agency in the story of Troilus.en_US
dc.description.embargo2016-09-30
dc.local.finalYesen_US
nui.item.downloads259


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record