Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTay, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorKelleher, Cecily
dc.contributor.authorHope, Ann
dc.contributor.authorBarry, Margaret M.
dc.contributor.authorNic Gabhainn, Saoirse
dc.contributor.authorSixsmith, Jane
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-11T16:37:19Z
dc.date.available2011-11-11T16:37:19Z
dc.date.issued2004-01-26
dc.identifier.citationTay, J. B., Kelleher, C. C., Hope, A., Barry, M., Nic Gabhainn, S., & Sixsmith, J. (2004). Influence of sociodemographic and neighbourhood factors on self rated health and quality of life in rural communities: findings from the Agriproject in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(11), 904-911.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-2738
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/2319
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine the influence of sociodemographic and neighbourhood factors on self rated health, quality of life, and perceived opportunities for change (as one measure of empowerment) in rural Irish communities. Design: Pooled data from cross sectional surveys two years apart. Setting: Respondents in four randomly selected rural district electoral divisions with a population size of between 750 and 2000. Participants: 1738 rural dwellers aged 15-93, 40.5% men, interviewed at two time points. Main outcome measures: Determinants of self rated health (SRH), quality of life (QOL), and perceived opportunities for change, rated on a closed option Likert scale and assessed in multivariate logistic regression models. Main results: Overall 23.8% of the sample reported poor SRH, 22.2% poor QOL, and 50.1% low perceived opportunities for change. Low financial security and dissatisfaction with work were each significantly associated with poor SRH (OR = 1.96 (1.50 to 2.56) and 1.54 (1.11 to 2.14)), with poor QOL (OR = 2.04 (1.56 to 2.68) and 1.87 (1.34 to 2.61). Concern about access to public services was significantly predictive of SRH (OR = 1.47 (1.11 to 1.94)) rather than access to health care (that is, hospital and GP services). There were distinct sex specific patterns and a generational effect for educational status in men. Variables associated with social networks and social support were less strongly predictive of SRH and QOL when economic measures were accounted for. Conclusion: Inter-relations between indicators of health status, wellbeing, and deprivation are not well studied in rural communities. Material deprivation has a direct influence on both health status and quality of life, although immediate sources of support are relatively well preserved.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Groupen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectSelf rated healthen_US
dc.subjectIrish rural communitiesen_US
dc.subjectHealth Promotionen_US
dc.titleInfluence of sociodemographic and neighbourhood factors on self rated health and quality of life in rural communities: findings from the Agriproject in the Republic of Irelanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.local.publishedsourcehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2002.006643en_US
dc.description.peer-reviewedpeer-revieweden_US
dc.contributor.funderHealth Promotion Unit, Department of Health and Childrenen_US
dc.contributor.funderHealth and Safety Authorityen_US
dc.contributor.funderMedical and Scientific Committee of the Freemasons of Irelanden_US
dc.contributor.funderHealth Research Board of Irelanden_US
nui.item.downloads454


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland