Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMadden, Michael G.en
dc.identifier.citation"On the Classification Performance of TAN and General Bayesian Networks", Michael G. Madden. Proceedings of AI-2008, the Twenty-eighth SGAI International Conference, Cambridge, UK, December 2008.en
dc.description.abstractOver a decade ago, Friedman et al. introduced the Tree Augmented Naïve Bayes (TAN) classifier, with experiments indicating that it significantly outperformed Naïve Bayes (NB) in terms of classification accuracy, whereas general Bayesian network (GBN) classifiers performed no better than NB. This paper challenges those claims, using a careful experimental analysis to show that GBN classifiers significantly outperform NB on datasets analyzed, and are comparable to TAN performance. It is found that the poor performance reported by Friedman et al. are not attributable to the GBN per se, but rather to their use of simple empirical frequencies to estimate GBN parameters, whereas basic parameter smoothing (used in their TAN analyses but not their GBN analyses) improves GBN performance significantly. It is concluded that, while GBN classifiers may have some limitations, they deserve greater attention, particularly in domains where insight into classification decisions, as well as good accuracy, is required.en
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.subjectBayesian networks and classificationen
dc.subjectTree augmented naive Bays classifier (TAN)en
dc.subjectNaive Bays (NB)en
dc.subjectGeneral Bayesian Network (GBN)en
dc.subject.lcshNeural networks (Computer science)en
dc.subject.lcshBayesian statistical decision theory -- Data processing.en
dc.titleOn the Classification Performance of TAN and General Bayesian Networksen
dc.typeConference Paperen

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland