dc.contributor.author | Petre, Marian | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanders, Kate | |
dc.contributor.author | McCartney, Robert | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmadzadeh, Marzieh | |
dc.contributor.author | Connolly, Cornelia | |
dc.contributor.author | Hamouda, Sally | |
dc.contributor.author | Harrington, Brian | |
dc.contributor.author | Lumbroso, Jérémie | |
dc.contributor.author | Maguire, Joseph | |
dc.contributor.author | Malmi, Lauri | |
dc.contributor.author | McGill, Monica M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Vahrenhold, Jan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-09T15:40:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-09T15:40:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Petre, Marian, Sanders, Kate, McCartney, Robert, Ahmadzadeh, Marzieh, Connolly, Cornelia, Hamouda, Sally, Harrington, Brian, Lumbroso, Jérémie, Maguire, Joseph, Malmi, Lauri, McGill, Monica M., Vahrenhold, Jan. (2020). Mapping the landscape: Peer review in computing education research. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 20), Trondheim, Norway, June 17–18, 2020. | en_IE |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10379/16384 | |
dc.description.abstract | Peer review is a mainstay of academic publication indeed, it is
the peer-review process that provides much of the publications
credibility. As the number of computing education conferences
and the number of submissions increase, the need for reviewers
grows. This report does not attempt to set standards for reviewing;
rather, as a first step toward meeting the need for well qualified
reviewers, it presents an overview of the ways peer review is used
in various venues, both inside computing education and, for comparison, in closely-related areas outside our field. It considers four
key components of peer review in some depth: criteria, the review
process, roles and responsibilities, and ethics and etiquette. To do
so, it draws on relevant literature, guidance and forms associated
with peer review, interviews with journal editors and conference
chairs, and a limited survey of the computing education research
community. In addition to providing an overview of practice, this
report identifies a number of themes running through the discourse
that have relevance for decision making about how best to conduct
peer review for a given venue. | en_IE |
dc.format | application/pdf | en_IE |
dc.language.iso | en | en_IE |
dc.publisher | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) | en_IE |
dc.relation.ispartof | ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 20) | en |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ | |
dc.subject | peer review | en_IE |
dc.subject | computing education | en_IE |
dc.subject | peer review criteria | en_IE |
dc.subject | process | en_IE |
dc.subject | peer review roles | en_IE |
dc.subject | peer review ethics | en_IE |
dc.title | Mapping the landscape: Peer review in computing education research. | en_IE |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_IE |
dc.date.updated | 2020-12-09T11:35:16Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/3437800.3439207 | |
dc.local.publishedsource | https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3341525 | en_IE |
dc.description.peer-reviewed | peer-reviewed | |
dc.internal.rssid | 23844879 | |
dc.local.contact | Cornelia Connolly, Edu-G011, Nuns Island, Education Building, National University Of Ireland, Galway. +353 (0)91 492369 Email: cornelia.connolly@nuigalway.ie | |
dc.local.copyrightchecked | Yes | |
dc.local.version | ACCEPTED | |
nui.item.downloads | 152 | |