Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPetre, Marian
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Kate
dc.contributor.authorMcCartney, Robert
dc.contributor.authorAhmadzadeh, Marzieh
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Cornelia
dc.contributor.authorHamouda, Sally
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Brian
dc.contributor.authorLumbroso, Jérémie
dc.contributor.authorMaguire, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMalmi, Lauri
dc.contributor.authorMcGill, Monica M.
dc.contributor.authorVahrenhold, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T15:40:02Z
dc.date.available2020-12-09T15:40:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-17
dc.identifier.citationPetre, Marian, Sanders, Kate, McCartney, Robert, Ahmadzadeh, Marzieh, Connolly, Cornelia, Hamouda, Sally, Harrington, Brian, Lumbroso, Jérémie, Maguire, Joseph, Malmi, Lauri, McGill, Monica M., Vahrenhold, Jan. (2020). Mapping the landscape: Peer review in computing education research. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 20), Trondheim, Norway, June 17–18, 2020.en_IE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/16384
dc.description.abstractPeer review is a mainstay of academic publication indeed, it is the peer-review process that provides much of the publications credibility. As the number of computing education conferences and the number of submissions increase, the need for reviewers grows. This report does not attempt to set standards for reviewing; rather, as a first step toward meeting the need for well qualified reviewers, it presents an overview of the ways peer review is used in various venues, both inside computing education and, for comparison, in closely-related areas outside our field. It considers four key components of peer review in some depth: criteria, the review process, roles and responsibilities, and ethics and etiquette. To do so, it draws on relevant literature, guidance and forms associated with peer review, interviews with journal editors and conference chairs, and a limited survey of the computing education research community. In addition to providing an overview of practice, this report identifies a number of themes running through the discourse that have relevance for decision making about how best to conduct peer review for a given venue.en_IE
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_IE
dc.language.isoenen_IE
dc.publisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)en_IE
dc.relation.ispartofACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 20)en
dc.subjectpeer reviewen_IE
dc.subjectcomputing educationen_IE
dc.subjectpeer review criteriaen_IE
dc.subjectprocessen_IE
dc.subjectpeer review rolesen_IE
dc.subjectpeer review ethicsen_IE
dc.titleMapping the landscape: Peer review in computing education research.en_IE
dc.typeConference Paperen_IE
dc.date.updated2020-12-09T11:35:16Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3437800.3439207
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3341525en_IE
dc.description.peer-reviewedpeer-reviewed
dc.internal.rssid23844879
dc.local.contactCornelia Connolly, Edu-G011, Nuns Island, Education Building, National University Of Ireland, Galway. +353 (0)91 492369 Email: cornelia.connolly@nuigalway.ie
dc.local.copyrightcheckedYes
dc.local.versionACCEPTED
nui.item.downloads16


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record