Mapping the landscape: Peer review in computing education research.
View/ Open
Date
2020-06-17Author
Petre, Marian
Sanders, Kate
McCartney, Robert
Ahmadzadeh, Marzieh
Connolly, Cornelia
Hamouda, Sally
Harrington, Brian
Lumbroso, Jérémie
Maguire, Joseph
Malmi, Lauri
McGill, Monica M.
Vahrenhold, Jan
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 151 (view details)
Cited 0 times in Scopus (view citations)
Recommended Citation
Petre, Marian, Sanders, Kate, McCartney, Robert, Ahmadzadeh, Marzieh, Connolly, Cornelia, Hamouda, Sally, Harrington, Brian, Lumbroso, Jérémie, Maguire, Joseph, Malmi, Lauri, McGill, Monica M., Vahrenhold, Jan. (2020). Mapping the landscape: Peer review in computing education research. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 20), Trondheim, Norway, June 17–18, 2020.
Published Version
Abstract
Peer review is a mainstay of academic publication indeed, it is
the peer-review process that provides much of the publications
credibility. As the number of computing education conferences
and the number of submissions increase, the need for reviewers
grows. This report does not attempt to set standards for reviewing;
rather, as a first step toward meeting the need for well qualified
reviewers, it presents an overview of the ways peer review is used
in various venues, both inside computing education and, for comparison, in closely-related areas outside our field. It considers four
key components of peer review in some depth: criteria, the review
process, roles and responsibilities, and ethics and etiquette. To do
so, it draws on relevant literature, guidance and forms associated
with peer review, interviews with journal editors and conference
chairs, and a limited survey of the computing education research
community. In addition to providing an overview of practice, this
report identifies a number of themes running through the discourse
that have relevance for decision making about how best to conduct
peer review for a given venue.
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Salutogenically focused outcomes in systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions: a systematic review of systematic reviews
Smith, Valerie; Daly, Deirdre; Lundgren, Ingela; Eri, Tine; Benstoem, Carina; Devane, Declan (Elsevier BV, 2014-04-01) -
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions
Devane, Declan (2011-02)Background: Hundreds of studies of maternity care interventions have been published, too many for most people involved in providing maternity care to identify and consider when making decisions. It became apparent that ... -
Improving customer decisions using product reviews: CROM - Car Review Opinion Miner
Dabrowski, Maciej; Acton, Thomas; Jarzebowski, Przemyslaw; O'Riain, Sean (2010-04-07)Online shopping is a very goal-oriented activity. Consumers have a set of preferences for a product or service that is used as criteria for assessment of the available alternatives. However, crucial information about ...