New opportunities and cautionary steps? Farmers, forestry and rural development in Ireland
Date
2011-03-30Author
McDonagh, John
Farrell, Maura
Mahon, Marie
Ryan, Mary
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 136 (view details)
Recommended Citation
McDonagh, John, Farrell, Maura, Mahon, Marie, & Ryan, Mary. (2011). New opportunities and cautionary steps? Farmers, forestry and rural development in Ireland. European Countryside, 2(4), 236-251. doi:10.2478/v10091-010-0016-2
Published Version
Abstract
It is argued that European agriculture is currently confronted with a multitude of
critical challenges and developmental changes, in which the viability of farms based
solely on traditional forms of production applies only to a minority who can compete
at the level and scale of global markets. The challenge to the remaining majority of
farmers and to wider agricultural communities is to remain viable through adoption of
alternative farm activities and enterprises under what is described as
a multifunctional model of agriculture. One activity that is emerging as a realistic
economic option under this rural restructuring is forestry. From an increasing range
of policy perspectives within agriculture, rural development, environment, tourism
and industry, forestry is becoming redefined as much more than a resource for
primary production. It is also an activity which offers enormous potential as
a secondary resource, particularly when its significance as an ecological, amenity,
recreational and environmental reserve is successfully realised. However, evidence
would suggest that Irish farmers have been particularly slow to embrace forestry as
a potential resource. In what is generally accepted as a time of economic crisis for
the agricultural sector, this paper explores the perceptions, attitudes and apparent
reluctance of Irish farmers to engage in forestry as a viable farm enterprise. We
assess this evidence against the prevailing EU and national policy context for
forestry, particularly the range of incentives and/or barriers to forestry, and seek to
establish if, and to what extent, reasons lie within the policy context, or whether
farmers contest the notion of forestry as an agricultural activity for other, more
ideological or practical, reasons.