Mental health as a weapon: Whistleblower retaliation and normative violence
Date
2018-04-17Author
Kenny, Kate
Fotaki, Marianna
Scriver, Stacey
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 153 (view details)
Cited 13 times in Scopus (view citations)
Recommended Citation
Kenny, Kate, Fotaki, Marianna, & Scriver, Stacey. (2019). Mental Health as a Weapon: Whistleblower Retaliation and Normative Violence. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 801-815. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3868-4
Published Version
Abstract
What form does power take in situations of retaliation against whistleblowers? In this article, we move away from dominant perspectives that see power as a resource. In place, we propose a theory of normative power and violence in whistleblower retaliation, drawing on an in-depth empirical study. This enables a deeper understanding of power as it circulates in complex processes of whistleblowing. We offer the following contributions. First, supported by empirical findings we propose a novel theoretical framing of whistleblower retaliation and the role of mental health, which draws upon poststructuralist psychoanalytic thinking. Specifically, we highlight how intra- and inter-psychic affective and ambivalent attachments to organizations influence the use of normative violence in cases of whistleblower retaliation. The second contribution is empirical and builds upon the existing literature on whistleblower retaliation by highlighting how organizations position whistleblower subjects as mentally unstable and unreliable individuals, to undermine their claims. We conclude by highlighting the implications of normative power for the outcomes of whistleblower struggles.