Characteristics, quality features and dynamics in formal youth mentoring relationships: The Rhodes model revisited
Date
2020-05-01Author
Brumovská, Tereza
Seidlová Málková, Gabriela
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 168 (view details)
Recommended Citation
Tereza Brumovská, Gabriela Seidlová Málková (2020). Characteristics, quality features and dynamics in formal youth mentoring relationships: the Rhodes model revisited. Československá psychologie, 64(2), 197-211.
Published Version
Abstract
Youth mentoring interventions are based on one-to-one long-term mentoring
relationships formed between a volunteer and socially disadvantaged children and
young people, and operate also in the Czech Republic. The paper presents a literature
review that revisits the Rhodes Theoretical Model on mentoring processes (2002, 2005).
In particular, the presented literature review operates the characteristics and dynamics
of mentoring relational features that do or do not mediate mentoring benefits in formal
youth mentoring relationships. It contributes to the current theory, research and
evidence-based practice in the field of youth mentoring, social psychology and theories
on development in social context with 1) Synthetizing the features of formal youth
mentoring relationships associated with the quality of mentoring bonds; 2) Reviewing
the research studies on relational dynamics and quality. Thus, it reviews the beneficial
as well as risk relational and individual features in formal youth mentoring bonds, and
3) Reviewing features of Beneficial and Risky formal youth mentoring bonds. As a
result, it revisits the model of pathways of benefits in formal youth mentoring
relationships (Rhodes, 2002, 2005) according to the literature results published in the
field to date. Subsequently, it informs academics, professionals and volunteers who
interact with children and young people in the role of mentors, significant adults and
role models; and thus contribute to evidence-based practice in these professions and
services with research evidence on mentoring principles.