Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorO'Connor, Paul
dc.contributor.advisorKelly, Maureen E.
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Ciara Maria Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-27T09:33:45Z
dc.date.available2020-02-27T09:33:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/15805
dc.description.abstractDue to the large volume of primary care consultations and increasing patient complexity, there is substantial potential for unintentional patient harm. Measuring and monitoring of safety is essential to identify the contributory factors to patient harm and to strengthen safety systems to reduce the risk of future harm. Whilst proactive safety assessment methods are emerging in primary care, General Practitioners (GPs) report difficulty in knowing how to improve patient safety. A multi-method approach was taken to examine how patient safety can be measured, monitored and improved in primary care and how GPs can use this information to improve patient safety. Study 1 is a systematic review of the safety climate (SC) survey instruments that have been utilized in primary care. It considers the reliability and validity of these measures and their suitability for use in primary care settings. Study 2 reports the findings from a survey of perceived SC across primary care practitioners and staff in Ireland and compares the findings to similar SC surveys conducted in primary care in England and Scotland. These findings highlight the negative impact of workload on perceived SC across the three studies. Study 3 describes the feasibility of implementing a patient safety intervention developed to proactively improve safety in primary care. It specifically addresses the impact of the intervention on SC and the acceptability of the intervention to GPs and practice staff. Finally, study 4 identifies contributory factors to patient safety incidents in primary care using the critical incident technique interview approach. The findings from these four studies highlight the importance of choosing measurement instruments that are valid, reliable, feasible and context-specific. These studies demonstrate that there are a wide range of approaches to support safety improvement in primary care. The challenge is how to encourage and support the use of these techniques in busy GP practices.en_IE
dc.publisherNUI Galway
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectPatient safetyen_IE
dc.subjectprimary careen_IE
dc.subjectgeneral practiceen_IE
dc.subjectsafety climateen_IE
dc.subjectpatient safety interventionen_IE
dc.subjectpatient safety incidenten_IE
dc.subjectcritical incident technique interviewen_IE
dc.subjectMedicineen_IE
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen_IE
dc.subjectMedicine Nursing and Health Sciencesen_IE
dc.titleMeasuring and improving patient safety in general practice in Irelanden_IE
dc.typeThesisen
dc.contributor.funderHealth and Safety Executiveen_IE
dc.contributor.funderAUDGPIen_IE
dc.contributor.funderIrish College of General Practitionersen_IE
dc.local.noteThere is potential for unintentional harm to patients as a result of their primary healthcare interactions. This study used a multi-method approach to examine how best to measure, monitor and improve patient safety and how GPs can utilise this information to reduce the risk of unintentional harm to patients.en_IE
dc.local.finalYesen_IE
nui.item.downloads299


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland