A study of workers’ mobilization within the Irish supermarket sector

View/ Open
Date
2019-10-04Author
Carty, John
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 1158 (view details)
Abstract
This thesis examines why workers in the Irish large supermarket sector acquire a sense
of collective identity separate from their employer’s organization in response to
perceived injustice and why they engage in collective action. The data is collected
from two of the largest supermarket chains in Irish retail. The first is the British-based
Multinational Enterprise (MNE), Tesco, and the second MNE is the Irish owned
Dunnes. Using a qualitative study, the thesis examines the perceptions, attitudes and
actions of four groups of workers: shop stewards formally recognised in Tesco; union
member employees in Tesco; union activists in Dunnes (where no formal recognition
exists), and union member employees in Dunnes.
Kelly’s (1998) Mobilization Theory has been chosen as the theoretical framework, as
the theory’s concepts of injustice, common identity and attribution help to understand
why workers collectively mobilize and engage in collective organization and activity.
The thesis finds that in the two large supermarket organizations in this study, workers’
sense of injustice was predominantly subject to their economic necessity to earn a
livelihood; the focus of attribution can change from individual managers to their
employer’s organization; the study also suggests that common identity can be
fragmented due to fear of management. Finally, collective organization and activity
were discouraged by fear of management counter-mobilization tactics. This countermobilization is facilitated by the constitutional legal framework notion that the parties
to an employment contract are equally free to enter or not enter these contracts of
employment.
The contributions of the thesis are: (i) industrial relations in the retail sector is underresearched and (ii) Mobilization Theory has not been previously utilised in a retail
setting. This thesis helps to narrow these academic gaps. Theoretically, the thesis finds
that the utility of Mobilization Theory lacks predictability due to its overlapping
modules and conflicting variables. However, this thesis finds that Mobilization
Theory, when used in an application approach, has explanatory utility. The thesis
builds on the application approach by demonstrating its new conceptual model is of
use to both academic scholars and practitioners within the field of industrial relations.