A study into the reasons for process improvement project failures: results from a pilot survey

Date
2019-07-22Author
Antony, Jiju
Lizarelli, Fabiane Letícia
Fernandes, Marcelo Machado
Dempsey, Mary
Brennan, Attracta
McFarlane, Julie
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 1570 (view details)
Cited 12 times in Scopus (view citations)
Recommended Citation
Antony, J., Lizarelli, F., Fernandes, M., Dempsey, M., Brennan, A. and McFarlane, J. (2019), "A study into the reasons for process improvement project failures: results from a pilot survey", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2019-0093
Published Version
Abstract
Purpose
Process improvement initiatives, such as Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma, typically have common characteristics that are carried through projects. Whilst a project’s performance is an important determinant of the successful implementation of continuous improvement (CI) initiatives, its failure can undermine the impact of any CI initiative on business performance. As a result, an understanding of the reasons of process improvement project failures is crucial. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a pilot survey highlighting the most common reasons for process improvement project failures.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper presents a pilot survey of 42 Brazilian manufacturing specialists who have been involved in process improvement projects. The participants of this survey were Six Sigma Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts and Six Sigma champions from manufacturing companies in Brazil. The survey questionnaire was piloted with five experts in the field in order to ensure that the questions were valid and technically sound.
Findings
The execution of Six Sigma projects in organizations results in a moderate rate of project failures. These failures can cost organizations several millions of dollars especially within the context of larger organizations. The main reasons for project failure, as cited by the specialists include: resistance to change, lack of commitment and support from top management and incompetent teams.
Research limitations/implications
The authors report the findings from a pilot survey having a limited sample size. Moreover, the data have been collected from one country and primarily from large manufacturing companies.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical study looking into the reasons for process improvement project failures. The authors argue that if the top reasons for such failures are understood, a framework can be developed in the future that can mitigate the chance of project failures during project execution. This could potentially lead to significant savings to the bottom-line of many organizations.
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Investigating the rationale for adopting an internationally-recognised project management methodology in Ireland: The view of the project manager
McHugh, Orla; Hogan, Mairéad (Elsevier, 2009-11-05)As businesses become more dependent on technology, effective project management has been recognised as a necessity, in order to lead and deliver quality software applications on time and within budget. One possible option ... -
Project failure en masse: a study of loose budgetary control in ISD projects
Conboy, Kieran (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010-05-18)This paper investigates the tightness of budgetary control over projects in a large systems development multinational. This represents a case of extreme information systems development (ISD) failure en masse, where all but ... -
Aid policy, aid projects and aid practitioners. The role of agency, actors and interfaces in 'pro-poor development' projects in post-apartheid South Africa and post-communist Baltic States
McAlinden, Peter Gerard (2018-02-23)The dissertation is about understanding the role of agency in the production of the unintended outcomes of international development interventions ‘designed’ to eliminate rural poverty and underdevelopment. It takes as its ...