Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGethin, Georgina
dc.contributor.authorCowman, Seamus
dc.contributor.authorKolbach, Dinanda N.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T16:08:40Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T16:08:40Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-14
dc.identifier.citationGethin G, Cowman S, Kolbach DN. Debridement for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD008599. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008599.pub2en_IE
dc.identifier.issn1469-493X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/14636
dc.description.abstractBackground Venous ulcers (also known as varicose or venous stasis ulcers) are a chronic, recurring and debilitating condition that affects up to 1% of the population. Best practice documents and expert opinion suggests that the removal of devitalised tissue from venous ulcers (debridement) by any one of six methods helps to promote healing. However, to date there has been no review of the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to support this. Objectives To determine the effects of different debriding methods or debridement versus no debridement, on the rate of debridement and wound healing in venous leg ulcers. Search methods In February 2015 we searched: The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE and EBSCO CINAHL. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. In addition we handsearched conference proceedings, journals not cited in MEDLINE, and the bibliographies of all retrieved publications to identify potential studies. We made contact with the pharmaceutical industry to enquire about any completed studies. Selection criteria We included RCTs, either published or unpublished, which compared two methods of debridement or compared debridement with no debridement. We presented study results in a narrative form, as meta‐analysis was not possible. Data collection and analysis Independently, two review authors completed all study selection, data extraction and assessment of trial quality; resolution of disagreements was completed by a third review author.en_IE
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_IE
dc.language.isoenen_IE
dc.publisherCochrane Collaborationen_IE
dc.relation.ispartofCochrane Database Of Systematic Reviewsen
dc.subjectWounden_IE
dc.subjectUlceren_IE
dc.subjectDebridementen_IE
dc.titleDebridement for venous leg ulcersen_IE
dc.typeArticleen_IE
dc.date.updated2018-11-06T13:58:51Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/14651858.CD008599.pub2
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/14651858.CD008599.pub2en_IE
dc.description.peer-reviewedpeer-reviewed
dc.internal.rssid10760736
dc.local.contactGeorgina Gethin, School Of Nursing & Midwifery, Nui Galway. Email: georgina.gethin@nuigalway.ie
dc.local.copyrightcheckedYes
dc.local.versionPUBLISHED
nui.item.downloads275


Files in this item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. Please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

The following license files are associated with this item:

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record