Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Paula R.
dc.contributor.authorAltman, Douglas G.
dc.contributor.authorBagley, Heather
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Karen L.
dc.contributor.authorBlazeby, Jane M.
dc.contributor.authorBrookes, Sara T.
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Mike
dc.contributor.authorGargon, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorGorst, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorHarman, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorKirkham, Jamie J.
dc.contributor.authorMcNair, Angus
dc.contributor.authorPrinsen, Cecilia A. C.
dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, Jochen
dc.contributor.authorTerwee, Caroline B.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Bridget
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:28:31Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:28:31Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.identifier.citationWilliamson, Paula R. Altman, Douglas G.; Bagley, Heather; Barnes, Karen L.; Blazeby, Jane M.; Brookes, Sara T.; Clarke, Mike; Gargon, Elizabeth; Gorst, Sarah; Harman, Nicola; Kirkham, Jamie J.; McNair, Angus; Prinsen, Cecilia A. C.; Schmitt, Jochen; Terwee, Caroline B.; Young, Bridget (2017). The comet handbook: version 1.0. Trials 18 ,
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/14438
dc.description.abstractThe selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and practice, the outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making decisions about health care. It is now widely acknowledged that insufficient attention has been paid to the choice of outcomes measured in clinical trials. Researchers are increasingly addressing this issue through the development and use of a core outcome set, an agreed standardised collection of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area. Accumulating work in this area has identified the need for guidance on the development, implementation, evaluation and updating of core outcome sets. This Handbook, developed by the COMET Initiative, brings together current thinking and methodological research regarding those issues. We recommend a four-step process to develop a core outcome set. The aim is to update the contents of the Handbook as further research is identified.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofTrials
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectcore outcome set
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcomet initiative
dc.subjectpatients and the public
dc.subjectcore outcome set
dc.subjectsystemic-lupus-erythematosus
dc.subjectquality-of-life
dc.subjectlow-back-pain
dc.subjectinitiative database progress
dc.subjectrandomized controlled-trials
dc.subjectacute stroke trials
dc.subjectclinical-trials
dc.subjectend-points
dc.subjectinternational consensus
dc.titleThe comet handbook: version 1.0
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4?site=trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland