dc.contributor.author | Vellinga, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Galvin, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Duane, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Callan, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bennett, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cormican, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Domegan, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Murphy, A. W. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-20T16:27:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-20T16:27:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-11-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vellinga, A. Galvin, S.; Duane, S.; Callan, A.; Bennett, K.; Cormican, M.; Domegan, C.; Murphy, A. W. (2015). Intervention to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection: a cluster randomized trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal 188 (2), 108-115 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0820-3946,1488-2329 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10379/14290 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Overuse of antimicrobial therapy in the community adds to the global spread of antimicrobial resistance, which is jeopardizing the treatment of common infections.
Methods: We designed a cluster randomized complex intervention to improve antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection in Irish general practice. During a 3-month baseline period, all practices received a workshop to promote consultation coding for urinary tract infections. Practices in intervention arms A and B received a second workshop with information on antimicrobial prescribing guidelines and a practice audit report (baseline data). Practices in intervention arm B received additional evidence on delayed prescribing of antimicrobials for suspected urinary tract infection. A reminder integrated into the patient management software suggested first-line treatment and, for practices in arm B, delayed prescribing. Over the 6-month intervention, practices in arms A and B received monthly audit reports of antimicrobial prescribing.
Results: The proportion of antimicrobial prescribing according to guidelines for urinary tract infection increased in arms A and B relative to control (adjusted overall odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 3.2; arm A adjusted OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.1; arm B adjusted OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.0). An unintended increase in antimicrobial prescribing was observed in the intervention arms relative to control (arm A adjusted OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.0; arm B adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.1). Improvements in guideline-based prescribing were sustained at 5 months after the intervention.
Interpretation: A complex intervention, including audit reports and reminders, improved the quality of prescribing for urinary tract infection in Irish general practice. | |
dc.publisher | Joule Inc. | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Canadian Medical Association Journal | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ | |
dc.subject | general-practice | |
dc.subject | management | |
dc.subject | nitrofurantoin | |
dc.subject | resistance | |
dc.subject | women | |
dc.title | Intervention to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection: a cluster randomized trial | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1503/cmaj.150601 | |
dc.local.publishedsource | http://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/2/108.full.pdf | |
nui.item.downloads | 0 | |