Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSultan, Sherif
dc.contributor.authorTawfick, Wael
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:25:57Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:25:57Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-01
dc.identifier.citationSultan, Sherif; Tawfick, Wael (2010). Ps172. does topical wound oxygen (two2) offer an improved outcome over conventional compression dressings (ccd) in the management of refractory non-healing venous ulcers (rvu)? three-year technical and clinical outcome and midterm results with quality-adjusted time spent without symptoms of disease and toxicity of treatment (q-twist). Journal of Vascular Surgery 51 , 65s-65s
dc.identifier.issn0741-5214
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/14068
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Vascular Surgery
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.titlePs172. does topical wound oxygen (two2) offer an improved outcome over conventional compression dressings (ccd) in the management of refractory non-healing venous ulcers (rvu)? three-year technical and clinical outcome and midterm results with quality-adjusted time spent without symptoms of disease and toxicity of treatment (q-twist)
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.172
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.172
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland