Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShephard, S.
dc.contributor.authorReid, D. G.
dc.contributor.authorGerritsen, H. D.
dc.contributor.authorFarnsworth, K. D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:24:34Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:24:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-27
dc.identifier.citationShephard, S. Reid, D. G.; Gerritsen, H. D.; Farnsworth, K. D. (2014). Estimating biomass, fishing mortality, and "total allowable discards" for surveyed non-target fish. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72 (2), 458-466
dc.identifier.issn1054-3139,1095-9289
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/13894
dc.description.abstractDemersal fisheries targeting a few high-value species often catch and discard other "non-target" species. It is difficult to quantify the impact of this incidental mortality when population biomass of a non-target species is unknown. We calculate biomass for 14 demersal fish species in ICES Area VIIg (Celtic Sea) by applying species-and length-based catchability corrections to catch records from the Irish Groundfish Survey (IGFS). We then combine these biomass estimates with records of commercial discards (and landings for marketable non-target species) to calculate annual harvesting rates (HR) for each study species. Uncertainty is incorporated into estimates of both biomass andHR. Our survey-based HR estimates for cod and whiting compared well with HR-converted fishing mortality (F) estimates from analytical assessments for these two stocks. Of the non-target species tested, red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) recorded some annual HRs greater than those for cod or whiting; challenging "Pope's postulate" that F on non-target stocks in an assemblage will not exceed that on target stocks. We relate HR for each species to two corresponding maximum sustainable yield (MSY) reference levels; six non-target species (including three ray species) show annual HRs >= HRMSY. This result suggests that it may not be possible to conserve vulnerable non-target species when F is coupled to that of target species. Based on biomass, HR, and HRMSY, we estimate "total allowable catch" for each non-target species.
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.relation.ispartofICES Journal of Marine Science
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjectbycatch
dc.subjectcatchability
dc.subjectdata-poor stocks
dc.subjectelasmobranchs
dc.subjectpope's postulate
dc.subjectstock assessment
dc.subjectlife-history
dc.subjectceltic sea
dc.subjectmanagement
dc.subjectfisheries
dc.subjectcatchability
dc.subjectcommunity
dc.subjecttraits
dc.subjectimpact
dc.subjectskates
dc.subjectrisk
dc.titleEstimating biomass, fishing mortality, and "total allowable discards" for surveyed non-target fish
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icesjms/fsu146
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/72/2/458/8857729/fsu146.pdf
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland