Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMay, Carl R
dc.contributor.authorMair, Frances
dc.contributor.authorFinch, Tracy
dc.contributor.authorMacFarlane, Anne
dc.contributor.authorDowrick, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorTreweek, Shaun
dc.contributor.authorRapley, Tim
dc.contributor.authorBallini, Luciana
dc.contributor.authorOng, Bie Nio
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Anne
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorElwyn, Glyn
dc.contributor.authorLégaré, France
dc.contributor.authorGunn, Jane
dc.contributor.authorMontori, Victor M
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:16:22Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-21
dc.identifier.citationMay, Carl R; Mair, Frances; Finch, Tracy; MacFarlane, Anne; Dowrick, Christopher; Treweek, Shaun; Rapley, Tim; Ballini, Luciana; Ong, Bie Nio; Rogers, Anne; Murray, Elizabeth; Elwyn, Glyn; Légaré, France; Gunn, Jane; Montori, Victor M (2009). Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implementation Science 4 ,
dc.identifier.issn1748-5908
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/12691
dc.description.abstractBackground: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built. Methods: Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model. Results: Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory. Conclusion: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofImplementation Science
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
dc.subjecthealth technology-assessment
dc.subjectprimary-care
dc.subjectcomplex interventions
dc.subjectprocess model
dc.subjecttelemedicine
dc.subjectservices
dc.titleDevelopment of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1748-5908-4-29?site=implementationscience.biomedcentral.com
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland