Evaluation of variables influencing success and complication rates in canine total hip replacement: results from the british veterinary orthopaedic association canine hip registry (collation of data: 2010–2012)
View/ Open
Full Text
Date
2017-04-06Author
Henderson, Elisabeth R.
Wills, Andrew
Torrington, Andrew M.
Moores, Andy P.
Thomson, David
Arthurs, Gareth
Brown, Gordon
Denny, Hamish R.
Scott, Harry W.
MacQueen, Ian
Dunne, James
Onyett, Jeremy
Walker, John D.
Prior, John
Owen, Martin R.
Burton, Neil
Whitelock, Richard
Girling, Sarah
Morrison, Shane
Gilbert, Simon
Langley-Hobbs, Sorrel J.
Gemmill, Toby J.
Störk, Christoph K.
Bright, Steve
Comerford, Eithne
Pettitt, Rob
Macdonald, Nick
Innes, John F.
Metadata
Show full item recordUsage
This item's downloads: 0 (view details)
Cited 6 times in Scopus (view citations)
Recommended Citation
Henderson, Elisabeth R. Wills, Andrew; Torrington, Andrew M.; Moores, Andy P.; Thomson, David; Arthurs, Gareth; Brown, Gordon; Denny, Hamish R.; Scott, Harry W.; MacQueen, Ian; Dunne, James; Onyett, Jeremy; Walker, John D.; Prior, John; Owen, Martin R.; Burton, Neil; Whitelock, Richard; Girling, Sarah; Morrison, Shane; Gilbert, Simon; Langley-Hobbs, Sorrel J.; Gemmill, Toby J.; Störk, Christoph K.; Bright, Steve; Comerford, Eithne; Pettitt, Rob; Macdonald, Nick; Innes, John F. (2017). Evaluation of variables influencing success and complication rates in canine total hip replacement: results from the british veterinary orthopaedic association canine hip registry (collation of data: 2010–2012). Veterinary Record 181 (1),
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the variables associated with complications of total hip replacement (THR) and report owner-assessed outcomes. Entries into the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association-Canine Hip Registry (BVOA-CHR) between September 2011 and December 2012 were reviewed separately and in conjunction with previous data (January 2010-August 2011). An outcomes assessment questionnaire was used to collect data from owners. Incidences of surgeon-reported and owner-reported complications were 8.2 per cent and 4.3 per cent, respectively. THR using the BioMedtrix BFX cup/stem prosthesis had a greater incidence of complications compared with THR using the BioMedtrix CFX cup/stem prosthesis (P=0.002); complications were 4.48 times more likely when using the BioMedtrix BFX cup/stem prosthesis versus the BioMedtrix CFX cup/stem prosthesis. THR using the BioMedtrix BFX cup/stem prosthesis had a higher incidence of complications compared with THR using a hybrid prosthesis (BioMedtrix BFX cup/CFX stem, BioMedtrix CFX cup/BFX stem) (P=0.046); complications were 2.85 times more likely when using the BioMedtrix BFX cup/ stem prosthesis versus a hybrid prosthesis. In 95 per cent of cases, owner satisfaction with the outcome of THR was 'very good' or 'good'. Complication rates from the BVOA-CHR are similar to previous studies. The data suggest that prosthesis type is associated with complication rate, with BioMedtrix BFX (circa 2012) having a high short-term complication rate.