Implementation of the smart move intervention in primary care: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory
Glynn, Liam G.
Wilkinson, Louise Gaffney
Hayes, Patrick S.
Murphy, Andrew W. M.
MetadataShow full item record
This item's downloads: 0 (view details)
Cited 5 times in Scopus (view citations)
Glynn, Liam G. Glynn, Fergus; Casey, Monica; Wilkinson, Louise Gaffney; Hayes, Patrick S.; Heaney, David; Murphy, Andrew W. M. (2018). Implementation of the smart move intervention in primary care: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory. BMC Family Practice 19 ,
Background: Problematic translational gaps continue to exist between demonstrating the positive impact of healthcare interventions in research settings and their implementation into routine daily practice. The aim of this qualitative evaluation of the SMART MOVE trial was to conduct a theoretically informed analysis, using normalisation process theory, of the potential barriers and levers to the implementation of a mhealth intervention to promote physical activity in primary care. Methods: The study took place in the West of Ireland with recruitment in the community from the Clare Primary Care Network SMART MOVE trial participants and the staff from four primary care centres were invited to take part and all agreed to do so. A qualitative methodology with a combination of focus groups (general practitioners, practice nurses and non-clinical staff from four separate primary care centres, n = 14) and individual semi-structured interviews (intervention and control SMART MOVE trial participants, n = 4) with purposeful sampling utilising the principles of Framework Analysis was utilised. The Normalisation Process Theory was used to develop the topic guide for the interviews and also informed the data analysis process. Results: Four themes emerged from the analysis: personal and professional exercise strategies; roles and responsibilities to support active engagement; utilisation challenges; and evaluation, adoption and adherence. It was evident that introducing a new healthcare intervention demands a comprehensive evaluation of the intervention itself and also the environment in which it is to operate. Despite certain obstacles, the opportunity exists for the successful implementation of a novel healthcare intervention that addresses a hitherto unresolved healthcare need, provided that the intervention has strong usability attributes for both disseminators and target users and coheres strongly with the core objectives and culture of the health care environment in which it is to operate. Conclusion: We carried out a theoretical analysis of stakeholder informed barriers and levers to the implementation of a novel exercise promotion tool in the Irish primary care setting. We believe that this process amplifies the implementation potential of such an intervention in primary care.