Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFeeney, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorBorry, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorFelzmann, Heike
dc.contributor.authorGalvagni, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorHaukkala, Ari
dc.contributor.authorLoi, Michele
dc.contributor.authorNordal, Salvör
dc.contributor.authorRakic, Vojin
dc.contributor.authorRiso, Brígida
dc.contributor.authorSterckx, Sigrid
dc.contributor.authorVears, Danya
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:07:49Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:07:49Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-24
dc.identifier.citationFeeney, Oliver; Borry, Pascal; Felzmann, Heike; Galvagni, Lucia; Haukkala, Ari; Loi, Michele; Nordal, Salvör; Rakic, Vojin; Riso, Brígida; Sterckx, Sigrid; Vears, Danya (2017). Genuine participation in participant-centred research initiatives: the rhetoric and the potential reality. Journal of Community Genetics 9 (2), 133-142
dc.identifier.issn1868-310X,1868-6001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/11435
dc.description.abstractThe introduction of Web 2.0 technology, along with a population increasingly proficient in Information and Communications Technology (ICT), coupled with the rapid advancements in genetic testing methods, has seen an increase in the presence of participant-centred research initiatives. Such initiatives, aided by the centrality of ICT interconnections, and the ethos they propound seem to further embody the ideal of increasing the participatory nature of research, beyond what might be possible in non-ICT contexts alone. However, the majority of such research seems to actualise a much narrower definition of 'participation'-where it is merely the case that such research initiatives have increased contact with participants through ICT but are otherwise non-participatory in any important normative sense. Furthermore, the rhetoric of participant-centred initiatives tends to inflate this minimalist form of participation into something that it is not, i.e. something genuinely participatory, with greater connections with both the ICT-facilitated political contexts and the largely non-ICT participatory initiatives that have expanded in contemporary health and research contexts. In this paper, we highlight that genuine (ICT-based) 'participation' should enable a reasonable minimum threshold of participatory engagement through, at least, three central participatory elements: educative, sense of being involved and degree of control. While we agree with criticisms that, at present, genuine participation seems more rhetoric than reality, we believe that there is clear potential for a greater ICT-facilitated participatory engagement on all three participatory elements. We outline some practical steps such initiatives could take to further develop these elements and thereby their level of ICT-facilitated participatory engagement.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Community Genetics
dc.subjectparticipant-centred research
dc.subjectict
dc.subjectparticipatory engagement
dc.subjectweb 2.0
dc.subjectpublic engagement
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.subjectcitizens
dc.subjectpolicy
dc.subjectgovernance
dc.subjectmedicine
dc.subjectgenetics
dc.subjectdeliberation
dc.subjectdemocracy
dc.subjectscience
dc.titleGenuine participation in participant-centred research initiatives: the rhetoric and the potential reality
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12687-017-0342-4
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12687-017-0342-4.pdf
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record