Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDanaher, John
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:05:03Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:05:03Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-13
dc.identifier.citationDanaher, John (2014). Robotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: should they be criminalised?. Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1), 71-95
dc.identifier.issn1871-9791,1871-9805
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/11049
dc.description.abstractSoon there will be sex robots. The creation of such devices raises a host of social, legal and ethical questions. In this article, I focus in on one of them. What if these sex robots are deliberately designed and used to replicate acts of rape and child sexual abuse? Should the creation and use of such robots be criminalised, even if no person is harmed by the acts performed? I offer an argument for thinking that they should be. The argument consists of two premises. The first claims that it can be a proper object of the criminal law to regulate wrongful conduct with no extrinsically harmful effects on others (the moralistic premise). The second claims that the use (and possibly the manufacture) of robots that replicate acts of rape and child sexual abuse would be wrongful, even if such usage had no extrinsically harmful effects on others. I defend both premises of this argument and consider its implications for the criminal law. I do not offer a conclusive argument for criminalisation, nor would I wish to be interpreted as doing so; instead, I offer a tentative argument and a framework for future debate. This framework may also lead one to question the proposed rationales for criminalisation.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofCriminal Law and Philosophy
dc.subjectsex robots
dc.subjectcriminalisation
dc.subjectmoral character
dc.subjectpublic wrongs
dc.subjectrobotic rape
dc.subjectrobotic child sexual abuse
dc.subjectpornography
dc.subjectmorality
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectobjectification
dc.subjectarguments
dc.subjectattitudes
dc.subjectautonomy
dc.subjectmurder
dc.subjectwomen
dc.subjectlegal
dc.titleRobotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: should they be criminalised?
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11572-014-9362-x
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://philpapers.org/archive/DANRRA-3.pdf
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record