Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCockayne, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorHewitt, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorHashmi, Farina
dc.contributor.authorHicks, Kate
dc.contributor.authorConcannon, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Kim
dc.contributor.authorHall, Jill
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Judith
dc.contributor.authorTorgerson, David
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T16:03:36Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T16:03:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-12
dc.identifier.citationCockayne, Sarah; Hewitt, Catherine; Hashmi, Farina; Hicks, Kate; Concannon, Michael; McIntosh, Caroline; Thomas, Kim; Hall, Jill; Watson, Judith; Torgerson, David; Watt, Ian (2016). Implementation of blinded outcome assessment in the effective verruca treatments trial (evert) – lessons learned. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 9 ,
dc.identifier.issn1757-1146
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10379/10826
dc.description.abstractBackground: Trials using inadequate levels of blinding may report larger effect sizes than blinded studies. It has been suggested that blinded outcome assessment in open trials may in some cases be undertaken by assessments of photographs. The aim of this paper is to explore the effect of using different methods to assess the primary outcome in the EVerT (Effective Verruca Treatments) trial. It also aims to give an overview of the experiences of using digital photographs within the trial. Methods: We undertook a secondary analysis to explore the effect of using three different methods to assess the primary outcome in the EVerT trial: assessment of digital photographs by blinded healthcare professionals; blinded healthcare professional assessment at the recruiting site and patient self-report. The verruca clearance rates were calculated using the three different methods of assessment. A Cohen's kappa measure of inter-rater agreement was used to assess the agreement between the methods. We also investigated the experiences of healthcare professionals using digital photographs within the trial. Results: Digital photographs for 189 out of 240 (79 %) patients in the trial were received for outcome assessment. Of the 189 photographs, 30 (16 %) were uninterpretable. The overall verruca clearance rates were 21 % (43/202,) using the unblinded patient self-reported outcome, 6 % (9/159,) using blinded assessment of digital photographs and 14 % (30/210,) using blinded outcome assessment at the site. Conclusions: Despite differences in the clearance rates found using different methods of outcome assessment, this did not change the original conclusion of the trial, that there is no evidence of a difference in effectiveness between cryotherapy and salicylic acid. Future trials using digital photographs should consider individual training needs at sites and have a backup method of assessment agreed a priori.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Foot and Ankle Research
dc.subjectblinding
dc.subjectdigital photographs
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectrandomised controlled trial
dc.subjectrandomized trials
dc.titleImplementation of blinded outcome assessment in the effective verruca treatments trial (evert) – lessons learned
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13047-016-0155-4
dc.local.publishedsourcehttps://jfootankleres.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13047-016-0155-4?site=jfootankleres.biomedcentral.com
nui.item.downloads0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record