Large-scale movements in european badgers: has the tail of the movement kernel been underestimated?
Byrne, Andrew W.
Quinn, John L.
O'Keeffe, James J.
Paddy Sleeman, D.
Wayne Martin, S.
MetadataShow full item record
This item's downloads: 0 (view details)
Byrne, Andrew W. Quinn, John L.; O'Keeffe, James J.; Green, Stuart; Paddy Sleeman, D.; Wayne Martin, S.; Davenport, John (2014). Large-scale movements in european badgers: has the tail of the movement kernel been underestimated?. Journal of Animal Ecology 83 (4), 991-1001
Characterizing patterns of animal movementis a major aimin population ecology, and yet doing so at an appropriate spatial scale remains a major challenge. Estimating the frequency and distances of movements is of particular importance when species are implicated in the transmission of zoonotic diseases. European badgers (Meles meles) areclassically viewed as exhibiting limited dispersal, and yet their movements bring them into conflict with farmers due to their potential to spread bovine tuberculosis in parts of their range.Considerable uncertainty surrounds themovement potential of badgers, and this may be related tothe spatial scale of previous empirical studies.We conducted a large-scale mark-recapture study (755km2; 2008-2012; 1935 capture events; 963 badgers) to investigate movement patterns in badgers, and undertook a comparative meta-analysis using published data from 15 European populations. The dispersal movement (&gt;1km) kernel followed an inverse power-law function, with a substantial tail' indicating the occurrence of rare long-distance dispersal attempts during the study period. The mean recorded distance from this distribution was 2 center dot 6km, the 95 percentile was 7 center dot 3km and the longest recorded was 22 center dot 1km. Dispersal frequency distributions were significantly different between genders; males dispersed more frequently than females, but females made proportionally more long-distance dispersal attempts than males. We used a subsampling approach to demonstrate that the appropriate minimum spatial scale to characterize badger movements in our study population was 80km2, substantially larger than many previous badger studies. Furthermore, the meta-analysis indicated a significant association between maximum movement distance and study area size, while controlling for population density. Maximum long-distance movements were often only recorded by chance beyond the boundaries of study areas. These findings suggest that the tail of the badger movement distribution is currently underestimated. The implications of this for understanding the spatial ecology of badger populations and for the design of disease intervention strategies are potentially significant.