Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlom, Jeanet W.
dc.contributor.authorEl Azzi, Maya
dc.contributor.authorWopereis, Daisy M.
dc.contributor.authorGlynn, Liam
dc.contributor.authorMuth, Christiane
dc.contributor.authorvan Driel, Mieke L.
dc.identifier.citationBlom, Jeanet W. El Azzi, Maya; Wopereis, Daisy M.; Glynn, Liam; Muth, Christiane; van Driel, Mieke L. (2015). Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?. Heart Failure Reviews 20 (4), 385-392
dc.description.abstractOlder people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-relevant outcomes have penetrated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reporting of these outcomes was reviewed in heart failure trials that included patients with multimorbidity. We systematically reviewed RCTs (Jan 2011-June 2012) and evaluated reported outcomes. Heart failure was chosen as condition of interest as this is common among older patients with multimorbidity. The main outcome was the proportion of RCTs reporting all-cause mortality, all-cause hospital admission, and outcomes in four domains of health, i.e. functional, signs and symptoms, psychological, and social domains. Of the 106 included RCTs, 50 (47 %) reported all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and 29 (27 %) reported all-cause hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization. Of all trials, 68 (64 %) measured outcomes in the functional domain, 80 (75 %) in the domain of signs and symptoms, 65 (61 %) in the psychological domain, and 59 (56 %) in the social domain. Disease-specific instruments were more often used than non-disease-specific instruments. This review shows increasing attention for more patient-relevant outcomes; this is promising and indicates more awareness of the importance of a variety of outcomes desirable for patients. However, patients' individual goal attainments were universally absent. For continued progress in patient-centred care, efforts are needed to develop these outcomes, study their merits and pitfalls, and intensify their use in research.
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofHeart Failure Reviews
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
dc.subjectheart failure
dc.subjectpatient-reported outcomes
dc.subjectmultiple chronic conditions
dc.subjectrandomized controlled-trial
dc.subjectuniversal health outcomes
dc.subjectpsychometric properties
dc.titleReporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland