<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/393">
<title>Centre for Excellence in Learning &amp; Teaching (Scholarly Articles)</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/393</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6488"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6394"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6192"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/5799"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2017-10-29T23:06:28Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6488">
<title>Trust schools and the politics of persuasion and the mobilisation of interest</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6488</link>
<description>Trust schools and the politics of persuasion and the mobilisation of interest
Warren, Simon; Webb, Darren; Franklin, Anita; Bowers-Brown, Julian
This paper sets out the theoretical and methodological approach of a study of the politics of persuasion and the mobilisation of interest in relation to the Trust schools initiative in England. Drawing on the discourse theoretical approach of Laclau and Mouffe the paper argues that the politics of consensus associated with New Labour reconfigures the field of politics, closing down legitimate democratic space. Building on this approach and that of policy sociology the paper outlines how the researchers seeks to address the following questions   if the space for legitimate democratic debate is so severely constrained then how does a social democratic government deal with the kind of opposition that Labour faced in relation to Trust schools? How do governments persuade dissident citizens to support unpopular policies? How are citizens mobilised to support such policies? This also raises questions about how, in such a restricted political space, do those questioning or resisting such policies, engage in the politics of persuasion and the mobilisation of interests? The reconfiguration of the field of politics and what this means for the constitution of legitimate democratic debate is the object of study of the research.
</description>
<dc:date>2011-06-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6394">
<title>Openness and praxis: exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6394</link>
<description>Openness and praxis: exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education
Cronin, Catherine
Open educational practices (OEP) is a broad descriptor of practices that include the creation, use and reuse of open educational resources (OER) as well as open pedagogies and open sharing of teaching practices. As compared with OER, there has been little empirical research on individual educators  use of OEP for teaching in higher education. This research study addresses that gap, exploring the digital and pedagogical strategies of a diverse group of university educators, focusing on whether, why and how they use OEP for teaching. The study was conducted at one Irish university; semi-structured interviews were carried out with educators across multiple disciplines. Only a minority of educators used OEP. Using constructivist grounded theory, a model of the concept  Using OEP for teaching  was constructed showing four dimensions shared by open educators: balancing privacy and openness, developing digital literacies, valuing social learning, and challenging traditional teaching role expectations. The use of OEP by educators is complex, personal and contextual; it is also continuously negotiated. These findings suggest that research-informed policies and collaborative and critical approaches to openness are required to support staff, students and learning in an increasingly complex higher education environment.
</description>
<dc:date>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6192">
<title>Struggling for visibility in higher education: caught between neoliberalism 'out there' and 'in here' - an autoethnographic account</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6192</link>
<description>Struggling for visibility in higher education: caught between neoliberalism 'out there' and 'in here' - an autoethnographic account
Warren, Simon
What happens when neoliberalism as a structural and structuring force is&#13;
taken up within institutions of higher education, and works upon academics&#13;
in higher education individually? Employing a critical authoethnographic&#13;
approach, this paper explores the way technologies of research performance&#13;
management, specifically, work to produce academics (and academic&#13;
managers) as particular kinds of neoliberal subject. The struggle to make&#13;
oneself visible is seen to occur under the gaze of academic normativity   the&#13;
norms of academic practice that include both locally negotiated practices&#13;
and the performative demands of auditing and metrics that characterise&#13;
the neoliberal university. The paper indicates how the dual process of being&#13;
worked upon and working upon ourselves can produce personally harmful&#13;
effects. The result is a process of systemic violence. This paper invites higher&#13;
education workers and policy-makers to think higher education otherwise&#13;
and to reconsider our personal and collective complicity in the processes&#13;
shaping higher education.
</description>
<dc:date>2016-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/5799">
<title>The trouble of ‘living with others’: language, community and the politics of belonging</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/5799</link>
<description>The trouble of ‘living with others’: language, community and the politics of belonging
Warren, Simon
In this article I ask myself the following question: ‘Rather than try to escape the seemingly awful choice between the private and the public, between the particular and universal, or between justice and freedom, I ask if I simply have the option to enact democracy and see ‘what follows?’. To reach that question I engage with an empirical problem, namely the struggle over the legitimacy of the Irish language as a public good, and more specifically as the medium for education in an Irish secondary school. In response to this I analyse the situation in terms of a politics of belonging. However, I then flip my reasoning, questioning its tendency towards ‘master explication’ and the privileged position of the theorist, and instead explore the possibilities offered by an anarchic approach. This latter orientation involves a reading against myself through a dialogue with the work of Gert Biesta as he engages with Jacques Rancière’s concept of subjectification. And so, instead of trying to escape (to master?) the awful choice between justice OR freedom, I am led towards the openness of ‘what follows?’.
Journal article
</description>
<dc:date>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
