<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>History (Scholarly Articles)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/602" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/602</id>
<updated>2017-10-29T21:54:08Z</updated>
<dc:date>2017-10-29T21:54:08Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Humanitarianisms in context</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6618" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>O'Sullivan, Kevin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hilton, Matthew</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Fiori, Juliano</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6618</id>
<updated>2017-06-29T01:01:23Z</updated>
<published>2016-03-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Humanitarianisms in context
O'Sullivan, Kevin; Hilton, Matthew; Fiori, Juliano
This introduction describes the rapidly expanding history of non-state humanitarianism in terms of three themes. First, it argues that we should think about humanitarianism less in terms of ruptures or breaks, and focus more on the moments of acceleration and the continuities that shaped that narrative: how the relationships among local, national and international discourses were played out in the shift between imperial and post-colonial worlds, in the dialogue between religious and secular traditions, and in the transformative processes of decolonization, de-regulation and globalization. Second, we suggest the need to re-think the geography of non-state humanitarianism. Drawing attention to the transnational contexts and traditions in which ideas of humanitarianism have been articulated not only adds to our understanding of transnational action and the strength of global civil society beyond the West, we argue, it allows us to better appreciate the myriad languages and practices of humanitarianism employed in a global context. Finally, this introduction also re-visits the question of motivation. By looking beyond the state, we argue, we can better understand the variety of motives that shaped the act of giving: from compassion to capturing markets, the search for efficiency, and the construction of local, national and international identities.
</summary>
<dc:date>2016-03-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Humanitarian encounters: Biafra, NGOs and imaginings of the Third World in Britain and Ireland, 1967-70</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6616" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>O'Sullivan, Kevin</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6616</id>
<updated>2017-06-29T01:01:20Z</updated>
<published>2014-08-21T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Humanitarian encounters: Biafra, NGOs and imaginings of the Third World in Britain and Ireland, 1967-70
O'Sullivan, Kevin
This article examines the influence of the&#13;
Biafran humanitarian crisis on British and Irish conceptions of the Third&#13;
World. Drawing on evidence from NGOs in both countries, it argues that the&#13;
explosion of non-governmental activity in this period, combined with the&#13;
unprecedented attention afforded to the relief effort, crystallized a popular&#13;
vision of the Third World that was rooted in Western internationalism and the&#13;
legacies of the imperial world. The model of humanitarian action pursued by Oxfam,&#13;
Save the Children, Africa Concern, and others, transformed non-governmental&#13;
actors into key mediators between the West and the Third World. Yet, this&#13;
article argues, the image they presented, and the tactics they pursued, can&#13;
only be understood as part of a broader adjustment to a decolonized world. From&#13;
very different beginnings (British postcolonial responsibilities versus a&#13;
strong anticolonial narrative in Ireland) considerable similarities emerged&#13;
between British and Irish NGOs. The response to Biafra was an extension of the&#13;
missionary and colonial service ethos, and generated a model of relief that&#13;
privileged humanitarian action over local political and human agency. That&#13;
paternalistic approach further reinforced traditional attitudes to the Third World&#13;
through renewed emphases on donation, dependency, expatriate volunteers, and&#13;
Western concepts of  needs  and  development . This article concludes,&#13;
therefore, by arguing that Biafra played a vital role in the shift from&#13;
imperial humanitarianism to neo-humanitarianism and the rise of liberal&#13;
humanitarian governance. The vision of an inclusive  common humanity  the NGOs&#13;
espoused was in practice rooted in a very Western understanding of humanitarian&#13;
responsibilities and a very Western image of the Third World.
</summary>
<dc:date>2014-08-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>'Ah, Ireland, the caring nation': foreign aid and Irish state identity in the long 1970s</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6615" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>O'Sullivan, Kevin</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6615</id>
<updated>2017-06-29T01:01:27Z</updated>
<published>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">'Ah, Ireland, the caring nation': foreign aid and Irish state identity in the long 1970s
O'Sullivan, Kevin
On a plane leaving Baidoa refugee camp in Somalia in late 1992, an Arab doctor offered John O'Shea, head of the relief agency Goal, a glimpse of how the Irish were viewed in that civil war-ravaged state. ‘Ah, Ireland’, he remarked on learning of O'Shea's country of origin, ‘the caring nation’. He had reason to be complimentary. In addition to the aid agencies and aid workers involved in the ongoing relief effort, Somalia had recently hosted two highprofile visitors from the Irish state. In August 1992 the minister for Foreign Affairs, David Andrews, spent three days in the country to view at first-hand its escalating civil war. He was followed less than two months later by President Mary Robinson, whose arrival at Baidoa on 2 October marked the beginning of a tour – the first by a Western head of state – of the feeding stations and refugee camps that provided succour to those displaced by the conflict.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Between internationalism and empire: Ireland, the 'Like-Minded' group, and the search for a new international order, 1974-82</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6614" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>O'Sullivan, Kevin</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6614</id>
<updated>2017-06-29T01:01:21Z</updated>
<published>2015-07-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Between internationalism and empire: Ireland, the 'Like-Minded' group, and the search for a new international order, 1974-82
O'Sullivan, Kevin
This article examines the response of a group of small and medium-sized states to the Global South's demands for a new international economic order in the 1970s and early 1980s. Reading that experience through the eyes of the group's smallest state, Ireland, it describes the rise of a loosely organised collective whose support for economic justice was based on three pillars: social democracy; Christian justice; and a broadly held (if variously defined) anti-colonialism. Internationalism, and in particular support for the institutions of the United Nations, became another distinguishing feature of like-minded action, and was an attempt by those states to carve out a space for independent action in the cold war. Detente and the decline of US hegemony helped in that respect, by encouraging a more globalist reading of the world order. Once the United States resumed its interventionist policies in the late 1970s, the room for like-minded initiatives declined. Yet the actions of the like-minded states should not be understood solely in terms of the changing dynamics of the cold war. This article concludes by arguing for the prominence of empire, decolonisation, and the enduring North-South binary in shaping international relations in a post-colonial world.
</summary>
<dc:date>2015-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
