http://hdl.handle.net/10379/601 2017-10-29T21:53:43Z 2017-10-29T21:53:43Z Clear, Caitriona http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6819 2017-09-20T01:01:11Z 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z

'No Good Days But The Present Ones?' Readers' Letters to Woman's Way 1963-69 Clear, Caitriona [No abstract available]

2015-01-01T00:00:00Z Forrestal, Alison http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6806 2017-09-13T01:01:03Z 2004-01-01T00:00:00Z

O’Brien, Terence Albert [1600-1651] Forrestal, Alison [No abstract available]

2004-01-01T00:00:00Z Forrestal, Alison http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6755 2017-08-24T01:01:01Z 2004-01-01T00:00:00Z

MacGeoghegan, Roche (1580–1644) Forrestal, Alison [No abstract available]

2004-01-01T00:00:00Z O'Sullivan, Kevin http://hdl.handle.net/10379/6669 2017-07-13T01:01:16Z 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z

A "global nervous system": The rise and rise of European humanitarian NGOs O'Sullivan, Kevin Going a step beyond the guiding principle of Amnesty International and the human rights movement that individuals could change the policies of foreign governments humanitarian NGOs emphasised the power of people-to-people interaction. In the process they contributed to a re-alignment of international relations, towards a more globalised concept of international action. Their activities became so prominent or at least their brands were so visible that the 1980s won the moniker the NGO decade , in recognition of their lasting impact on the aid industry. But why did the forty years after the end of the Second World War provide such fertile ground for the emergence of a European humanitarian NGO sector? And what role did states play in shaping non-governmental action? To answer these questions, this chapter combines an analysis of global currents of change with evidence from two national case studies: Britain and Ireland. It argues that the role of states and inter-governmental organisations in shaping the fortunes of NGOs implies that the emergence of the international humanitarian sector was not the simple, organic, bottom-up, process that is sometimes described. Instead, those who set the international agenda also largely dictated its terms of engagement. Only by appreciating the enduring importance of the state can we begin to unpack the complex relationships that emerged between actors at all levels of the international system in the second half of the twentieth century.

2014-01-01T00:00:00Z